Tuesday, May 5, 2026
HomeAppleThe Tolkien property has smote JRR Token — however the NFTs persist

The Tolkien property has smote JRR Token — however the NFTs persist

[ad_1]

It appears our prediction {that a} Lord of the Rings-themed “JRR Token” cryptocurrency was destined for the fires of Mount Doom was correct — the World Mental Property Group (or WIPO) has declared that it violated a trademark belonging to the property of creator J.R.R. Tolkien, and ordered that one of many mission’s net domains be transferred to that property (through the Monetary Occasions).

In case you’re unfamiliar with JRR Token (not Tolkien), right here’s the lore — it was a cryptocurrency mission that drew heavy inspiration from The Lord of the Rings. Its tagline was “The One Token That Guidelines Them All,” its web site featured Tolkien-esque imagery of rolling hills and wizards, and there was even a promotional video that includes an actor from the films making Hobbit puns and claiming that the token was going “to the moon.” It promised a bunch of monetary options known as “Tokenomics,” the precise particulars of which had been left annoyingly unclear by its (Lord of the Rings-themed) white paper and web site.

As many, many individuals predicted, all this didn’t sit effectively with the famously litigious Tolkien Property — it filed a criticism with WIPO on August seventh, the day after the tokens went on sale. The property claimed that the mission’s website, jrrtoken.com, violated its emblems, and supplied paragraphs of detailed explanations about how the web site was infringing on The Lord of the Rings. Truthfully, although, you possibly can in all probability get the gist by simply an online archive or screenshot of it.

In case you look carefully, you possibly can see delicate references to Lord of the Rings.
Through: The Wayback Machine

(Observe: the mission additionally had one other website, thetokenofpower.com — primarily based on Wayback Machine archives, the 2 websites seem to have had the identical content material, however solely the previous is talked about in WIPO’s writeup. Neither website accommodates details about the token anymore.)

In its protection, attorneys for the token tried to argue that folks wouldn’t confuse JRR Token with JRR Tolkien as a result of the “L” and “I” in Tolkien are “conspicuously absent” in Token, and the 2 phrases are pronounced in another way. The response additionally reads, partially:

J R R TOLKIEN will not be confusingly much like JRR TOKEN. The previous is a surname used as a trademark and the latter is an English phrase which means a type of digital forex.

Unusually, the WIPO panel (to not be confused with the Council of Elrond), wasn’t satisfied by these arguments, or by those saying it was meant to be a parody — it stated in its resolution that the area title was registered “in dangerous religion,” and that it “was chosen for the only real goal of making a false affiliation with” creator J.R.R. Tolkien. All of the Lord of the Rings references and imagery on the token’s web site didn’t assist the mission’s case both, in accordance with WIPO, nor did the truth that it was a business enterprise.

The panel additionally stated that the developer’s alternate clarification that the “JRR” in “JRR Token” really stood for “Journey via Danger to Reward” was in all probability bogus, provided that the phrase didn’t appear to be used on the positioning. In its personal phrases:

It isn’t clear to the Panel what “Journey via Danger to Reward” really means, and why the time period “journey” is related to the acquisition of tokens.

“There isn’t a doubt that the Respondent was conscious of Tolkien’s works and created a web site to commerce off the celebrity of those works,” reads a part of the WIPO’s resolution.

In accordance with The Guardian, the Tolkien property is now working to “delete any infringing on-line content material” — and certainly the token’s Twitter account, YouTube channel, and web sites seem like gone. To misquote The Fellowship of the Ring’s opening scene: one after the other, JRR Token’s websites and social media accounts fell to the ability of worldwide copyright regulation.

However, as they are saying, there have been some that resisted.

Like The One Ring in Tolkien’s story, the token has survived after a vogue — within the type of an OpenSea assortment. After all there are JRR Token NFTs, and for those who thought the principle mission was blatantly biting LotR simply wait till you feast your eyes on these (akin to how Gollum disgustingly feasts on a dwell fish in that one scene I nonetheless hate watching).

This can be the final haven for JRR Token’s on-line presence.

I too love to say that the dangerous guys of LotR had been pro-centralization, after which make all my NFTs depict the villains of the story.

Curiously, the NFTs weren’t talked about within the WIPO’s case write-up, although the timeline could supply some perception into that. As beforehand famous, the Tolkien property filed its criticism in early August, and the NFTs weren’t marketed on JRR Token’s web site till someday between August thirty first and September eleventh, in accordance with captures by the Wayback Machine.

Wanting on the blockchain provides us much more exact timing — OpenSea reveals that the NFTs had been minted on August thirty first, and had been both listed on the market or transferred to different accounts on September 1st. That’s, by the way in which, is the very same day the WIPO’s report says that JRR Token filed its response to the criticism. I pray that sometime I’m granted the boldness (however not the audacity) of the one who creates NFTs with characters from Lord of the Rings whereas preventing an infringement criticism from the Tolkien property.

I’m undecided what’s going to find yourself occurring to the JRR Token NFTs, although I don’t think about the Tolkien property will likely be joyful if it finds out about them. As for the remainder of the mission — if I’m sincere, that is just about precisely what I anticipated to occur. The Eye of Sauron could also be ever watchful, however the eye of The Tolkien Property is much more so — and no mere token could be anticipated to withstand the powers of the WIPO.

[ad_2]

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments