[ad_1]
A Twitter ballot by Natalie Mott confirmed that just about 80% of SEOs do count on to see some site visitors misplaced when managing a website migration. There have been over 1,300 votes on this ballot, which is so much for an search engine optimisation Twitter ballot, and 78.3% mentioned they do count on a site visitors drop, whereas 21.7% mentioned they don’t.
Right here is the ballot embedded:
Good morning search engine optimisation Twitter. When you’re managing a web site migration, do you robotically assume there might be some site visitors loss? Why / why not?
— Natalie Mott (@njmott) March 15, 2022
I’m really shocked 20% really mentioned they don’t count on to see any site visitors loss. I imply, even with probably the most excellent migrations, it is best to count on a brief time period (weeks) site visitors losses, then most likely positive factors, after which leveling off. However I suppose it will depend on what is definitely altering – however a migration does imply, shifting a considerable quantity of the positioning to a brand new area or platform.
Most SEOs who’ve expertise with website migrations can do a superb job managing the migration so the losses are minimal and non permanent. However extra importantly, these SEOs can handle expectations for the shopper.
When you click on by way of to the tweet, you may see extra detailed responses exterior of simply the survey outcomes.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
[ad_2]
