Rising zero-dimensional to four-dimensional biomaterials for bone regeneration | Journal of Nanobiotechnology

Maletis GB, Chen J, Inacio MCS, Love RM, Funahashi TT. Elevated danger of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts in contrast with autografts. Am J Sport Med. 2017;45(6):1333–40.

Google Scholar 

Salhotra A, Shah HN, Levi B, Longaker MT. Mechanisms of bone improvement and restore. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(11):696–711.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Backbone J. 2001;10:S96–101.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Nersisyan HH, Lee JH, Ding J-R, Kim Okay-S, Manukyan KV, Mukasyan AS. Combustion synthesis of zero-, one-, two- and three-dimensional nanostructures: present traits and future views. Prog Vitality Combust Sci. 2017;63:79–118.

Google Scholar 

Tibbits S. 4D printing: multi-material form change. Archit Design. 2014;84(1):116–21.

Google Scholar 

Kroto HW, Heath JR, O’Brien SC, Curl RF, Smalley RE. C60: buckminsterfullerene. Nature. 1985;318(6042):162–3.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Krätschmer W, Lamb LD, Fostiropoulos Okay, Huffman DR. Strong C60: a brand new type of carbon. Nature. 1990;347(6291):354–8.

Google Scholar 

Bonifazi D, Enger O, Diederich F. Supramolecular [60]fullerene chemistry on surfaces. Chem Soc Rev. 2007;36(2):390–414.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater. 2007;6(3):183–91.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Cassell AM, Asplund CL, Tour JM. Self-assembling supramolecular nanostructures from a C(60) spinoff: nanorods and vesicles. Angew Chem Int Ed. 1999;38(16):2403–5.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Guldi DM, Zerbetto F, Georgakilas V, Prato M. Ordering fullerene supplies at nanometer dimensions. Acc Chem Res. 2005;38(1):38–43.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Nakanishi T, Schmitt W, Michinobu T, Kurth DG, Ariga Okay. Hierarchical supramolecular fullerene architectures with managed dimensionality. Chem Commun. 2005;48:5982–4.

Google Scholar 

Sathish M, Miyazawa Okay. Dimension-tunable hexagonal fullerene (C60) nanosheets on the liquid–liquid interface. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(45):13816–7.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wakahara T, Sathish M, Miyazawa Okay, Hu C, Tateyama Y, Nemoto Y, et al. Preparation and optical properties of fullerene/ferrocene hybrid hexagonal nanosheets and large-scale manufacturing of fullerene hexagonal nanosheets. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(29):9940–4.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Krishnan V, Kasuya Y, Ji Q, Sathish M, Shrestha LK, Ishihara S, et al. Vortex-aligned fullerene nanowhiskers as a scaffold for orienting cell progress. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(28):15667–73.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Yang X, Li CJ, Wan Y, Smith P, Shang G, Cui Q. Antioxidative fullerol promotes osteogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:4023–31.

Google Scholar 

Yamakoshi Y, Umezawa N, Ryu A, Arakane Okay, Miyata N, Goda Y, et al. Energetic oxygen species generated from photoexcited fullerene (C60) as potential medicines: O2-* versus 1O2. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(42):12803–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Osswald S, Yushin G, Mochalin V, Kucheyev SO, Gogotsi Y. Management of sp2/sp3 carbon ratio and floor chemistry of nanodiamond powders by selective oxidation in air. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128(35):11635–42.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Grausova L, Bacakova L, Kromka A, Potocky S, Vanecek M, Nesladek M, et al. Nanodiamond as promising materials for bone tissue engineering. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2009;9(6):3524–34.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhang Q, Mochalin VN, Neitzel I, Knoke IY, Han J, Klug CA, et al. Fluorescent PLLA-nanodiamond composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32(1):87–94.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhang Q, Mochalin VN, Neitzel I, Hazeli Okay, Niu J, Kontsos A, et al. Mechanical properties and biomineralization of multifunctional nanodiamond-PLLA composites for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33(20):5067–75.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Parizek M, Douglas TE, Novotna Okay, Kromka A, Brady MA, Renzing A, et al. Nanofibrous poly(lactide-co-glycolide) membranes loaded with diamond nanoparticles as promising substrates for bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:1931–51.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Ponomarenko LA, Schedin F, Katsnelson MI, Yang R, Hill EW, Novoselov KS, et al. Chaotic dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science. 2008;320(5874):356–8.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Solar YP, Zhou B, Lin Y, Wang W, Fernando KA, Pathak P, et al. Quantum-sized carbon dots for vibrant and colourful photoluminescence. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128(24):7756–7.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Qiu J, Li D, Mou X, Li J, Guo W, Wang S, et al. Results of graphene quantum dots on the self-renewal and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(6):702–10.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Shao D, Lu M, Xu D, Zheng X, Pan Y, Music Y, et al. Carbon dots for monitoring and selling the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(9):1820–7.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Geng H, Qiu J, Zhu H, Liu X. Reaching stem cell imaging and osteogenic differentiation by utilizing nitrogen doped graphene quantum dots. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2018;29(6):85.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Han Y, Zhang F, Zhang J, Shao D, Wang Y, Li S, et al. Bioactive carbon dots direct the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Colloids Surf B. 2019;179:1–8.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Yang ST, Cao L, Luo PG, Lu F, Wang X, Wang H, et al. Carbon dots for optical imaging in vivo. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(32):11308–9.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Li S, Peng Z, Dallman J, Baker J, Othman AM, Blackwelder PL, et al. Crossing the blood–brain-barrier with transferrin conjugated carbon dots: a zebrafish mannequin examine. Colloids Surf B. 2016;145:251–6.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Khajuria DK, Kumar VB, Karasik D, Gedanken A. Fluorescent nanoparticles with tissue-dependent affinity for dwell zebrafish imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(22):18557–65.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Gogoi S, Kumar M, Mandal BB, Karak N. A renewable useful resource based mostly carbon dot embellished hydroxyapatite nanohybrid and its fabrication with waterborne hyperbranched polyurethane for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 2016;6(31):26066–76.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Khajuria DK, Kumar VB, Gigi D, Gedanken A, Karasik D. Accelerated bone regeneration by nitrogen-doped carbon dots functionalized with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(23):19373–85.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lu Y, Li L, Li M, Lin Z, Wang L, Zhang Y, et al. Zero-dimensional carbon dots improve bone regeneration, osteosarcoma ablation, and scientific bacterial eradication. Bioconjug Chem. 2018;29(9):2982–93.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Sarkar C, Chowdhuri AR, Kumar A, Laha D, Garai S, Chakraborty J, et al. One pot synthesis of carbon dots embellished carboxymethyl cellulose-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for drug supply, tissue engineering and Fe(3+) ion sensing. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:710–8.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Shafiei S, Omidi M, Nasehi F, Golzar H, Mohammadrezaei D, Rezai Rad M, et al. Egg shell-derived calcium phosphate/carbon dot nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: fabrication and characterization. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;100:564–75.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Das B, Dadhich P, Pal P, Dutta J, Dutta A, Srivas PK, et al. Doping of carbon quantum dots (CDs) in calcium phosphate nanorods for inducing ectopic chondrogenesis by way of activation of the HIF-alpha/SOX-9 pathway. ACS Omega. 2019;4(1):374–86.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Yi C, Liu D, Fong CC, Zhang J, Yang M. Gold nanoparticles promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by p38 MAPK pathway. ACS Nano. 2010;4(11):6439–48.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhang R, Lee P, Lui VC, Chen Y, Liu X, Lok CN, et al. Silver nanoparticles promote osteogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells and enhance bone fracture therapeutic in osteogenesis mechanism mouse mannequin. Nanomedicine. 2015;11(8):1949–59.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wang Q, Chen B, Cao M, Solar J, Wu H, Zhao P, et al. Response of MAPK pathway to iron oxide nanoparticles in vitro remedy promotes osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Biomaterials. 2016;86:11–20.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wan DQ, Chen DX, Li Okay, Qu Y, Solar Okay, Tao Okay, et al. Gold nanoparticles as a possible mobile probe for monitoring of stem cells in bone regeneration utilizing dual-energy computed tomography. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(47):32241–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lu JW, Yang F, Ke QF, Xie XT, Guo YP. Magnetic nanoparticles modified-porous scaffolds for bone regeneration and photothermal remedy in opposition to tumors. Nanomedicine. 2018;14(3):811–22.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Jandt KD. Evolutions, revolutions and traits in biomaterials science—a perspective. Adv Eng Mater. 2007;9(12):1035–50.

Google Scholar 

Kim W, Ng JK, Kunitake ME, Conklin BR, Yang P. Interfacing silicon nanowires with mammalian cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129(23):7228–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Liu D, Yi C, Wang Okay, Fong CC, Wang Z, Lo PK, et al. Reorganization of cytoskeleton and transient activation of Ca²⁺ channels in mesenchymal stem cells cultured on silicon nanowire arrays. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(24):13295–304.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Liu D, Yi C, Fong CC, Jin Q, Wang Z, Yu WK, et al. Activation of a number of signaling pathways through the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells cultured in a silicon nanowire microenvironment. Nanomedicine. 2014;10(6):1153–63.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kim HW, Kim HE, Knowles JC. Manufacturing and potential of bioactive glass nanofibers as a next-generation biomaterial. Adv Funct Mater. 2006;16(12):1529–35.

Google Scholar 

Lee JH, Rim NG, Jung HS, Shin H. Management of osteogenic differentiation and mineralization of human mesenchymal stem cells on composite nanofibers containing poly[lactic-co-(glycolic acid)] and hydroxyapatite. Macromol Biosci. 2010;10(2):173–82.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Bauer S, Kleber S, Schmuki P. TiO₂ nanotubes: tailoring the geometry in H₃PO₄/HF electrolytes. Electrochem Commun. 2006;8(8):1321–5.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Park J, Bauer S, von der Mark Okay, Schmuki P. Nanosize and vitality: TiO₂ nanotube diameter directs cell destiny. Nano Lett. 2007;7(6):1686–91.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Bauer S, Park J, von der Mark Okay, Schmuki P. Improved attachment of mesenchymal stem cells on super-hydrophobic TiO₂ nanotubes. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(5):1576–82.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, Teng D, Engler AJ, Chien S, et al. Stem cell destiny dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(7):2130–5.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Bauer S, Park J, Faltenbacher J, Berger S, von der Mark Okay, Schmuki P. Dimension selective conduct of mesenchymal stem cells on ZrO(2) and TiO(2) nanotube arrays. Integr Biol (Camb). 2009;1(8–9):525–32.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Wang N, Li H, Lu W, Li J, Wang J, Zhang Z, et al. Results of TiO₂ nanotubes with completely different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials. 2011;32(29):6900–11.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Iijima S. Carbon nanotubes: previous, current, and future. Physica B. 2002;323(1–4):1–5.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Peretz S, Regev O. Carbon nanotubes as nanocarriers in drugs. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;17(6):360–8.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Janas D, Vilatela AC, Koziol KKK. Efficiency of carbon nanotube wires in excessive situations. Carbon. 2013;62:438–46.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

An KH, Kim WS, Park YS, Moon JM, Bae DJ, Lim SC, et al. Electrochemical properties of high-power supercapacitors utilizing single-walled carbon nanotube electrodes. Adv Funct Mater. 2001;11(5):387–92.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Rinzler AG, Hafner JH, Nikolaev P, Nordlander P, Colbert DT, Smalley RE, et al. Unraveling nanotubes: subject emission from an atomic wire. Science. 1995;269(5230):1550–3.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Toprakci O, Toprakci HA, Ji L, Xu G, Lin Z, Zhang X. Carbon nanotube-loaded electrospun LiFePO₄/carbon composite nanofibers as secure and binder-free cathodes for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4(3):1273–80.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wong SS, Joselevich E, Woolley AT, Cheung CL, Lieber CM. Covalently functionalized nanotubes as nanometre-sized probes in chemistry and biology. Nature. 1998;394(6688):52–5.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Hirata E, Menard-Moyon C, Venturelli E, Takita H, Watari F, Bianco A, et al. Carbon nanotubes functionalized with fibroblast progress issue speed up proliferation of bone marrow-derived stromal cells and bone formation. Nanotechnology. 2013;24(43):435101.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhao B, Hu H, Mandal SK, Haddon RC. A bone mimic based mostly on the self-assembly of hydroxyapatite on chemically functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes. Chem Mater. 2005;17(12):3235–41.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Akasaka T, Watari F, Sato Y, Tohji Okay. Apatite formation on carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng C. 2006;26(4):675–8.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Matsuoka M, Akasaka T, Totsuka Y, Watari F. Robust adhesion of Saos-2 cells to multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng B. 2010;173(1–3):182–6.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Usui Y, Aoki Okay, Narita N, Murakami N, Nakamura I, Nakamura Okay, et al. Carbon nanotubes with excessive bone-tissue compatibility and bone-formation acceleration results. Small. 2008;4(2):240–6.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Sitharaman B, Shi XF, Walboomers XF, Liao HB, Cuijpers V, Wilson LJ, et al. In vivo biocompatibility of ultra-short single-walled carbon nanotube/biodegradable polymer nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. Bone. 2008;43(2):362–70.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Hahn BD, Lee JM, Park DS, Choi JJ, Ryu J, Yoon WH, et al. Mechanical and in vitro organic performances of hydroxyapatite-carbon nanotube composite coatings deposited on Ti by aerosol deposition. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(8):3205–14.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Xu JL, Khor KA, Sui JJ, Chen WN. Preparation and characterization of a novel hydroxyapatite/carbon nanotubes composite and its interplay with osteoblast-like cells. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29(1):44–9.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Lahiri D, Benaduce AP, Rouzaud F, Solomon J, Keshri AK, Kos L, et al. Put on conduct and in vitro cytotoxicity of damage particles generated from hydroxyapatite-carbon nanotube composite coating. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;96a(1):1–12.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Khalid P, Hussain MA, Rekha PD, Arun AB. Carbon nanotube-reinforced hydroxyapatite composite and their interplay with human osteoblast in vitro. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2015;34(5):548–56.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kaur T, Thirugnanam A. Tailoring in vitro organic and mechanical properties of polyvinyl alcohol strengthened with threshold carbon nanotube focus for improved mobile response. RSC Adv. 2016;6(46):39982–92.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Li HP, Zhao QY, Li BE, Kang JL, Yu ZY, Li YX, et al. Fabrication and properties of carbon nanotube-reinforced hydroxyapatite composites by a double in situ synthesis course of. Carbon. 2016;101:159–67.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Rodrigues BVM, Silva AS, Melo GFS, Vasconscellos LMR, Marciano FR, Lobo AO. Affect of low contents of superhydrophilic MWCNT on the properties and cell viability of electrospun poly (butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) fibers. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;59:782–91.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Gholami F, Ismail S, Noor AFM. Improvement of carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes and bovine serum albumin strengthened hydroxyapatite for bone substitute functions. J Aust Ceram Soc. 2017;53(1):117–27.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Rajesh R, Ravichandran YD. Improvement of a brand new carbon nanotube-alginate-hydroxyapatite tricomponent composite scaffold for software in bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10(Suppl 1):7–15.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Shokri S, Movahedi B, Rafieinia M, Salehi H. A brand new method to fabrication of Cs/BG/CNT nanocomposite scaffold in the direction of bone tissue engineering and analysis of its properties. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;357:1758–64.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Rajesh R, Ravichandran YD, Reddy MJK, Ryu SH, Shanmugharaj AM. Improvement of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotube-based polysaccharide-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. RSC Adv. 2016;6(85):82385–93.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Valverde TM, Castro EG, Cardoso MHS, Martins PA, Souza LMO, Silva PP, et al. A novel 3D bone-mimetic scaffold composed of collagen/MTA/MWCNT modulates cell migration and osteogenesis. Life Sci. 2016;162:115–24.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lin CJ, Han HJ, Zhang F, Li AM. Electrophoretic deposition of HA/MWNTs composite coating for biomaterial functions. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(7):2569–74.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Bai Y, Neupane MP, Park IS, Lee MH, Bae TS, Watari F, et al. Electrophoretic deposition of carbon nanotubes-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites on titanium substrate. Mater Sci Eng C. 2010;30(7):1043–9.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Abarrategi A, Gutierrez MC, Moreno-Vicente C, Hortiguela MJ, Ramos V, Lopez-Lacomba JL, et al. Multiwall carbon nanotube scaffolds for tissue engineering functions. Biomaterials. 2008;29(1):94–102.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Bhattacharya M, Wutticharoenmongkol-Thitiwongsawet P, Hamamoto DT, Lee D, Cui TH, Prasad HS, et al. Bone formation on carbon nanotube composite. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;96a(1):75–82.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Park S, Park J, Jo I, Cho SP, Sung D, Ryu S, et al. In situ hybridization of carbon nanotubes with bacterial cellulose for three-dimensional hybrid bioscaffolds. Biomaterials. 2015;58:93–102.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Chen WY, Yang RC, Wang HM, Zhang L, Hu KK, Li CH, et al. Self-assembled heterojunction carbon nanotubes synergizing with photoimmobilized IGF-1 inhibit mobile senescence. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(18):2413–26.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Supronowicz PR, Ajayan PM, Ullmann KR, Arulanandam BP, Metzger DW, Bizios R. Novel current-conducting composite substrates for exposing osteoblasts to alternating present stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(3):499–506.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Shao SJ, Zhou SB, Li L, Li JR, Luo C, Wang JX, et al. Osteoblast operate on electrically conductive electrospun PLA/MWCNTs nanofibers. Biomaterials. 2011;32(11):2821–33.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Liu D, Yi C, Zhang D, Zhang J, Yang M. Inhibition of proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells by carboxylated carbon nanotubes. ACS Nano. 2010;4(4):2185–95.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Xu Y, Li Z, Chen T, Lantz SM, Howard PC, et al. Mechanistic toxicity analysis of uncoated and PEGylated single-walled carbon nanotubes in neuronal PC12 cells. ACS Nano. 2011;5(9):7020–33.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, et al. Electrical subject impact in atomically skinny carbon movies. Science. 2004;306(5696):666–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Shin SR, Li YC, Jang HL, Khoshakhlagh P, Akbari M, Nasajpour A, et al. Graphene-based supplies for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;105(Pt B):255–74.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Novoselov KS, Fal’ko VI, Colombo L, Gellert PR, Schwab MG, Kim Okay. A roadmap for graphene. Nature. 2012;490(7419):192–200.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Li X, Cai W, An J, Kim S, Nah J, Yang D, et al. Massive-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene movies on copper foils. Science. 2009;324(5932):1312–4.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kalbacova M, Broz A, Kong J, Kalbac M. Graphene substrates promote adherence of human osteoblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells. Carbon. 2010;48(15):4323–9.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Aryaei A, Jayatissa AH, Jayasuriya AC. The impact of graphene substrate on osteoblast cell adhesion and proliferation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(9):3282–90.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lee WC, Lim CH, Shi H, Tang LA, Wang Y, Lim CT, et al. Origin of enhanced stem cell progress and differentiation on graphene and graphene oxide. ACS Nano. 2011;5(9):7334–41.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Nayak TR, Andersen H, Makam VS, Khaw C, Bae S, Xu X, et al. Graphene for managed and accelerated osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. ACS Nano. 2011;5(6):4670–8.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Crowder SW, Prasai D, Rath R, Balikov DA, Bae H, Bolotin KI, et al. Three-dimensional graphene foams promote osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nanoscale. 2013;5(10):4171–6.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Gao C, Liu T, Shuai C, Peng S. Enhancement mechanisms of graphene in nano-58S bioactive glass scaffold: mechanical and organic efficiency. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4712.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Jakus AE, Shah RN. Multi and blended 3D-printing of graphene-hydroxyapatite hybrid supplies for complicated tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(1):274–83.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Luo JJ, Zhang X, Machuki JO, Dai CB, Li Y, Guo KJ, et al. Three-dimensionally N-doped graphene-hydroxyapatite/agarose as an osteoinductive scaffold for enhancing bone regeneration. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2(1):299–310.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Boehm HP. Graphene-how a laboratory curiosity immediately turned extraordinarily fascinating. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2010;49(49):9332–5.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Akhavan O, Ghaderi E, Shahsavar M. Graphene nanogrids for selective and quick osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Carbon. 2013;59:200–11.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Liu H, Cheng J, Chen F, Bai D, Shao C, Wang J, et al. Gelatin functionalized graphene oxide for mineralization of hydroxyapatite: biomimetic and in vitro analysis. Nanoscale. 2014;6(10):5315–22.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Liu H, Cheng J, Chen F, Hou F, Bai D, Xi P, et al. Biomimetic and cell-mediated mineralization of hydroxyapatite by carrageenan functionalized graphene oxide. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(5):3132–40.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Elkhenany H, Amelse L, Lafont A, Bourdo S, Caldwell M, Neilsen N, et al. Graphene helps in vitro proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of goat grownup mesenchymal stem cells: potential for bone tissue engineering. J Appl Toxicol. 2015;35(4):367–74.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhao CH, Lu XZ, Zanden C, Liu JH. The promising software of graphene oxide as coating supplies in orthopedic implants: preparation, characterization and cell conduct. Biomed Mater. 2015;10(1):015019.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Qi YY, Tai ZX, Solar DF, Chen JT, Ma HB, Yan XB, et al. Fabrication and characterization of poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide nanofibrous biocomposite scaffolds. J Appl Polym Sci. 2013;127(3):1885–94.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Kang S, Park JB, Lee TJ, Ryu S, Bhang SH, La WG, et al. Covalent conjugation of mechanically stiff graphene oxide flakes to three-dimensional collagen scaffolds for osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Carbon. 2015;83:162–72.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Diez-Pascual AM, Diez-Vicente AL. Poly(propylene fumarate)/polyethylene glycol-modified graphene oxide nanocomposites for tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(28):17902–14.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Liu C, Wong HM, Yeung KWK, Tjong SC. Novel electrospun polylactic acid nanocomposite fiber mats with hybrid graphene oxide and nanohydroxyapatite reinforcements having enhanced biocompatibility. Polymers-Basel. 2016;8(8):287.

PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Shao WL, He JX, Sang F, Wang Q, Chen L, Cui SZ, et al. Enhanced bone formation in electrospun poly(l-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-tussah silk fibroin ultrafine nanofiber scaffolds included with graphene oxide. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;62:823–34.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Xie CM, Lu X, Han L, Xu JL, Wang ZM, Jiang LL, et al. Biomimetic mineralized hierarchical graphene oxide/chitosan scaffolds with adsorbability for immobilization of nanoparticles for biomedical functions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(3):1707–17.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Natarajan J, Madras G, Chatterjee Okay. Improvement of graphene oxide-/galactitol polyester-based biodegradable composites for biomedical functions. ACS Omega. 2017;2(9):5545–56.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Paz E, Forriol F, Del Actual JC, Dunne N. Graphene oxide versus graphene for optimisation of PMMA bone cement for orthopaedic functions. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;77:1003–11.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Peng SP, Feng P, Wu P, Huang W, Yang YW, Guo W, et al. Graphene oxide as an interface section between polyetheretherketone and hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46604.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Zhou T, Li G, Lin S, Tian T, Ma Q, Zhang Q, et al. Electrospun poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate)/graphene oxide scaffold: enhanced properties and promoted in vivo bone restore in rats. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(49):42589–600.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Liang CY, Luo YC, Yang GD, Xia D, Liu L, Zhang XM, et al. Graphene oxide hybridized nHAC/PLGA scaffolds facilitate the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018;13:15.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Liu YX, Fang N, Liu B, Music LN, Wen BY, Yang DZ. Aligned porous chitosan/graphene oxide scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Mater Lett. 2018;233:78–81.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Pahlevanzadeh F, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Hamzah E. In-vitro biocompatibility, bioactivity, and mechanical power of PMMA-PCL polymer containing fluorapatite and graphene oxide bone cements. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2018;82:257–67.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Sivashankari PR, Moorthi A, Abudhahir KM, Prabaharan M. Preparation and characterization of three-dimensional scaffolds based mostly on hydroxypropyl chitosan-graft-graphene oxide. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;110:522–30.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhang YD, Wang C, Fu L, Ye S, Wang M, Zhou YM. Fabrication and software of novel porous scaffold in situ-loaded graphene oxide and osteogenic peptide by cryogenic 3D printing for repairing critical-sized bone defect. Molecules. 2019;24(9):1699.

PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Luo Y, Shen H, Fang Y, Cao Y, Huang J, Zhang M, et al. Enhanced proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on graphene oxide-incorporated electrospun poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibrous mats. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(11):6331–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Depan D, Misra RDK. The interaction between nanostructured carbon-grafted chitosan scaffolds and protein adsorption on the mobile response of osteoblasts: structure-function property relationship. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(4):6084–94.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Nair M, Nancy D, Krishnan AG, Anjusree GS, Vadukumpully S, Nair SV. Graphene oxide nanoflakes included gelatin-hydroxyapatite scaffolds improve osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nanotechnology. 2015;26(16):161001.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wu C, Xia L, Han P, Xu M, Fang B, Wang J, et al. Graphene-oxide-modified β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics stimulate in vitro and in vivo osteogenesis. Carbon. 2015;93:116–29.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Kumar S, Raj S, Sarkar Okay, Chatterjee Okay. Engineering a multi-biofunctional composite utilizing poly(ethylenimine) embellished graphene oxide for bone tissue regeneration. Nanoscale. 2016;8(12):6820–36.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Zhai D, Xu M, Yao Q, Chang J, Wu C. 3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds with a Fe₃O₄/graphene oxide nanocomposite interface for hyperthermia remedy of bone tumor cells. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4(17):2874–86.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Unnithan AR, Sasikala ARK, Park CH, Kim CS. A novel scaffold for bone tissue engineering: an osteogenic mixture of graphene oxide-hyaluronic acid-chitosan with simvastatin. J Ind Eng Chem. 2017;46:182–91.

Google Scholar 

Tatavarty R, Ding H, Lu G, Taylor RJ, Bi X. Synergistic acceleration within the osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells by graphene oxide-calcium phosphate nanocomposites. Chem Commun (Camb). 2014;50(62):8484–7.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

La WG, Park S, Yoon HH, Jeong GJ, Lee TJ, Bhang SH, et al. Supply of a therapeutic protein for bone regeneration from a substrate coated with graphene oxide. Small. 2013;9(23):4051–60.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets by way of chemical discount of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon. 2007;45(7):1558–65.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Shin HJ, Kim KK, Benayad A, Yoon SM, Park HK, Jung IS, et al. Environment friendly discount of graphite oxide by sodium borohydride and its impact on electrical conductance. Adv Funct Mater. 2009;19(12):1987–92.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Chen H, Muller MB, Gilmore KJ, Wallace GG, Li D. Mechanically sturdy, electrically conductive, and biocompatible graphene paper. Adv Mater. 2008;20(18):3557–61.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Lu JY, He YS, Cheng C, Wang Y, Qiu L, Li D, et al. Self-supporting graphene hydrogel movie as an experimental platform to guage the potential of graphene for bone regeneration. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23(28):3494–502.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Cheng J, Liu HY, Zhao BJ, Shen R, Liu D, Hong JP, et al. MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast cell-mediated mineralization of hydroxyapatite by poly-dopamine-functionalized graphene oxide. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2015;30(3):289–301.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Lu JY, Cheng C, He YS, Lyu CQ, Wang YF, Yu J, et al. Multilayered graphene hydrogel membranes for guided bone regeneration. Adv Mater. 2016;28(21):4025–31.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Liu HY, Xi PX, Xie GQ, Shi YJ, Hou FP, Huang L, et al. Simultaneous discount and floor functionalization of graphene oxide for hydroxyapatite mineralization. J Phys Chem C. 2012;116(5):3334–41.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Kumar S, Chatterjee Okay. Strontium eluting graphene hybrid nanoparticles increase osteogenesis in a 3D tissue scaffold. Nanoscale. 2015;7(5):2023–33.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lee JH, Shin YC, Jin OS, Kang SH, Hwang YS, Park JC, et al. Diminished graphene oxide-coated hydroxyapatite composites stimulate spontaneous osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Nanoscale. 2015;7(27):11642–51.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lee JH, Shin YC, Lee SM, Jin OS, Kang SH, Hong SW, et al. Enhanced osteogenesis by diminished graphene oxide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposites. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18833.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Sasidharan A, Panchakarla LS, Chandran P, Menon D, Nair S, Rao CN, et al. Differential nano-bio interactions and toxicity results of pristine versus functionalized graphene. Nanoscale. 2011;3(6):2461–4.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Chang YL, Yang ST, Liu JH, Dong E, Wang YW, Cao AN, et al. In vitro toxicity analysis of graphene oxide on A549 cells. Toxicol Lett. 2011;200(3):201–10.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wang A, Pu Okay, Dong B, Liu Y, Zhang L, Zhang Z, et al. Function of floor cost and oxidative stress in cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of graphene oxide in the direction of human lung fibroblast cells. J Appl Toxicol. 2013;33(10):1156–64.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Yang Okay, Wan JM, Zhang SA, Zhang YJ, Lee ST, Liu ZA. In vivo pharmacokinetics, long-term biodistribution, and toxicology of PEGylated graphene in mice. ACS Nano. 2011;5(1):516–22.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Curran JM, Chen R, Hunt JA. The steering of human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation in vitro by managed modifications to the cell substrate. Biomaterials. 2006;27(27):4783–93.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Muller P, Bulnheim U, Diener A, Luthen F, Teller M, Klinkenberg ED, et al. Calcium phosphate surfaces promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12(1):281–91.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Dimitrievska S, Bureau MN, Antoniou J, Mwale F, Petit A, Lima RS, et al. Titania-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite coatings help human mesenchymal stem cells osteogenic differentiation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;98(4):576–88.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Yang BW, Yin JH, Chen Y, Pan SS, Yao HL, Gao YS, et al. 2D-black-phosphorus-reinforced 3D-printed scaffolds: a stepwise countermeasure for osteosarcoma. Adv Mater. 2018;30(10):1705611.

Google Scholar 

Lhotka C, Szekeres T, Steffan I, Zhuber Okay, Zweymuller Okay. 4-year examine of cobalt and chromium blood ranges in sufferers managed with two completely different metal-on-metal whole hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 2003;21(2):189–95.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Huiskes R, Weinans H, Rietbergen B. The connection between stress shielding and bone resorption round whole hip stems and the results of versatile supplies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:124–34.

Google Scholar 

Lopez-Heredia MA, Sohier J, Gaillard C, Quillard S, Dorget M, Layrolle P. Fast prototyped porous titanium coated with calcium phosphate as a scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2008;29(17):2608–15.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wu SL, Liu XM, Hu T, Chu PK, Ho JPY, Chan YL, et al. A biomimetic hierarchical scaffold: pure progress of nanotitanates on three-dimensional microporous Ti-based metals. Nano Lett. 2008;8(11):3803–8.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Chou DT, Wells D, Hong D, Lee B, Kuhn H, Kumta PN. Novel processing of iron-manganese alloy-based biomaterials by inkjet 3-D printing. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(10):8593–603.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Chen HJ, Wang CL, Zhu XD, Zhang Okay, Fan YJ, Zhang XD. Fabrication of porous titanium scaffolds by stack sintering of microporous titanium spheres produced with centrifugal granulation expertise. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014;43:182–8.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Vaithilingam J, Kilsby S, Goodridge RD, Christie SD, Edmondson S, Hague RJ. Functionalisation of Ti6Al4V parts fabricated utilizing selective laser melting with a bioactive compound. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;46:52–61.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Gopi D, Murugan N, Ramya S, Kavitha L. Electrodeposition of a porous strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite/zinc oxide duplex layer on AZ91 magnesium alloy for orthopedic functions. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(34):5531–40.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Dorozhkin SV. Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. Biomaterials. 2010;31(7):1465–85.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Ebrahimi M, Botelho MG, Dorozhkin SV. Biphasic calcium phosphates bioceramics (HA/TCP): idea, physicochemical properties and the influence of standardization of examine protocols in biomaterials analysis. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;71:1293–312.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Yu W, Solar X, Meng HY, Solar BC, Chen P, Liu XJ, et al. 3D printed porous ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: a evaluation. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(9):1690–8.

Google Scholar 

Suchanek W, Yoshimura M. Processing and properties of hydroxyapatite-based biomaterials to be used as arduous tissue substitute implants. J Mater Res. 1998;13(1):94–117.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Ko CL, Chen WC, Chen JC, Wang YH, Shih CJ, Tyan YC, et al. Properties of osteoconductive biomaterials: calcium phosphate cement with completely different ratios of platelet-rich plasma as identifiers. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(6):3537–44.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Fuchs RK, Thompson WR, Warden SJ. Bone biology. In: Bone restore biomaterials. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd; 2019. p. 15–52.

Google Scholar 

Kim SS, Park MS, Jeon O, Choi CY, Kim BS. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(8):1399–409.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Li CM, Vepari C, Jin HJ, Kim HJ, Kaplan DL. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(16):3115–24.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Nie HM, Wang CH. Fabrication and characterization of PLGA/HAp composite scaffolds for supply of BMP-2 plasmid DNA. J Management Launch. 2007;120(1–2):111–21.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Woodard JR, Hilldore AJ, Lan SK, Park CJ, Morgan AW, Eurell JAC, et al. The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials. 2007;28(1):45–54.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Warnke PH, Seitz H, Warnke F, Becker ST, Sivananthan S, Sherry E, et al. Ceramic scaffolds produced by computer-assisted 3D printing and sintering: characterization and biocompatibility investigations. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2010;93b(1):212–7.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Peng F, Yu XH, Wei M. In vitro cell efficiency on hydroxyapatite particles/poly(l-lactic acid) nanofibrous scaffolds with a superb particle alongside nanofiber orientation. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(6):2585–92.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kane RJ, Weiss-Bilka HE, Meagher MJ, Liu YX, Gargac JA, Niebur GL, et al. Hydroxyapatite strengthened collagen scaffolds with improved structure and mechanical properties. Acta Biomater. 2015;17:16–25.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Calabrese G, Giuffrida R, Fabbi C, Figallo E, Lo Furno D, Gulino R, et al. Collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds induce human adipose derived stem cells osteogenic differentiation in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0151181.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Goncalves EM, Oliveira FJ, Silva RF, Neto MA, Fernandes MH, Amaral M, et al. Three-dimensional printed PCL-hydroxyapatite scaffolds crammed with CNTs for bone cell progress stimulation. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2016;104(6):1210–9.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Carrodeguas RG, De Aza S. alpha-Tricalcium phosphate: synthesis, properties and biomedical functions. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(10):3536–46.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Egli RJ, Gruenenfelder S, Doebelin N, Hofstetter W, Luginbuehl R, Bohner M. Thermal remedies of calcium phosphate biomaterials to tune the physico-chemical properties and modify the in vitro osteoclast response. Adv Eng Mater. 2011;13(3):B102–7.

Google Scholar 

Raynaud S, Champion E, Lafon JP, Bernache-Assollant D. Calcium phosphate apatites with variable Ca/P atomic ratio III. Mechanical properties and degradation in resolution of scorching pressed ceramics. Biomaterials. 2002;23(4):1081–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kyriazis V, Tzaphlidou M. Skeletal calcium/phosphorus ratio measuring strategies and outcomes. I. Microscopy and microtomography. Sci World J. 2004;4:1027–34.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Vlad MD, Gomez S, Barraco M, Lopez J, Fernandez E. Impact of the calcium to phosphorus ratio on the setting properties of calcium phosphate bone cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(9):2081–90.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Tarafder S, Balla VK, Davies NM, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S. Microwave-sintered 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2013;7(8):631–41.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Matsuno T, Hashimoto Y, Adachi S, Omata Okay, Yoshitaka Y, Ozeki Y, et al. Preparation of injectable 3D-formed beta-tricalcium phosphate bead/alginate composite for bone tissue engineering. Dent Mater J. 2008;27(6):827–34.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Rakovsky A, Gotman I, Rabkin E, Gutmanas EY. beta-TCP-polylactide composite scaffolds with excessive power and enhanced permeability ready by a modified salt leaching technique. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014;32:89–98.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Tarafder S, Bose S. Polycaprolactone-coated 3D printed tricalcium phosphate scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: in vitro alendronate launch conduct and native supply impact on in vivo osteogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(13):9955–65.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Mohseni M, Jahandideh A, Abedi G, Akbarzadeh A, Hesaraki S. Evaluation of tricalcium phosphate/collagen (TCP/collagene)nanocomposite scaffold in contrast with hydroxyapatite (HA) on therapeutic of segmental femur bone defect in rabbits. Artif Cell Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(2):242–9.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Hench LL. Biomaterials: a forecast for the longer term. Biomaterials. 1998;19(16):1419–23.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Hench LL. The story of bioglass (R). J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17(11):967–78.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Reck R, Storkel S, Meyer A. Bioactive glass-ceramics in center ear surgical procedure. An 8-year evaluation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;523:100–6.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Ilharreborde B, Morel E, Fitoussi F, Presedo A, Souchet P, Pennecot GF, et al. Bioactive glass as a bone substitute for spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative examine with Iliac crest autograft. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(3):347–51.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Baino F, Vitale-Brovarone C. Three-dimensional glass-derived scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: present traits and forecasts for the longer term. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2011;97a(4):514–35.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC. Bonding mechanisms on the interface of ceramic prosthetic supplies. J Biomed Mater Res. 1971;5:117–41.

Google Scholar 

Baino F, Vitale-Brovarone C. Mechanical properties and reliability of glass-ceramic foam scaffolds for bone restore. Mater Lett. 2014;118:27–30.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Oki A, Parveen B, Hossain S, Adeniji S, Donahue H. Preparation and in vitro bioactivity of zinc containing sol–gel-derived bioglass supplies. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;69a(2):216–21.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Balamurugan A, Balossier G, Kannan S, Michel J, Rebelo AHS, Ferreira JMF. Improvement and in vitro characterization of sol–gel derived CaO–P₂O₅–SiO₂–ZnO bioglass. Acta Biomater. 2007;3(2):255–62.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhong JP, Greenspan DC. Processing and properties of sol–gel bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(6):694–701.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Sepulveda P, Jones JR, Hench LL. In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol–gel derived 58S bioactive glasses. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;61(2):301–11.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Eqtesadi S, Motealleh A, Pajares A, Guiberteau F, Miranda P. Enhancing mechanical properties of 13–93 bioactive glass robocast scaffold by poly(lactic acid) and poly(epsilon-caprolactone) soften infiltration. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2016;432:111–9.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Vergnol G, Ginsac N, Rivory P, Meille S, Chenal JM, Balvay S, et al. In vitro and in vivo analysis of a polylactic acid-bioactive glass composite for bone fixation units. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2016;104(1):180–91.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Zhang XD, Zeng DL, Li N, Wen J, Jiang XQ, Liu CS, et al. Functionalized mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds for enhanced bone tissue regeneration. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19361.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Lopez-Noriega A, Arcos D, Vallet-Regi M. Functionalizing mesoporous bioglasses for long-term anti-osteoporotic drug supply. Chem Eur J. 2010;16(35):10879–86.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Jiang SX, Zhang Y, Shu Y, Wu ZN, Cao WJ, Huang WX. Amino-functionalized mesoporous bioactive glass for drug supply. Biomed Mater. 2017;12(2):025017.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Ding H, Zhao CJ, Cui X, Gu YF, Jia WT, Rahaman MN, et al. A novel injectable borate bioactive glass cement as an antibiotic supply car for treating osteomyelitis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(1):e85472.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Zhang YD, Cui X, Zhao SC, Wang H, Rahaman MN, Liu ZT, et al. Analysis of injectable strontium-containing borate bioactive glass cement with enhanced osteogenic capability in a critical-sized rabbit femoral condyle defect mannequin. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(4):2393–403.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Cui X, Zhang YD, Wang H, Gu YF, Li L, Zhou J, et al. An injectable borate bioactive glass cement for bone restore: preparation, bioactivity and setting mechanism. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2016;432:150–7.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Liu XH, Ma PX. Polymeric scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004;32(3):477–86.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Hench LL, Polak JM. Third-generation biomedical supplies. Science. 2002;295(5557):1014–7.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Charulatha V, Rajaram A. Affect of various crosslinking remedies on the bodily properties of collagen membranes. Biomaterials. 2003;24(5):759–67.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Elbjeirami WM, Yonter EO, Starcher BC, West JL. Enhancing mechanical properties of tissue-engineered constructs by way of lysyl oxidase crosslinking exercise. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;66a(3):513–21.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Brinkman WT, Nagapudi Okay, Thomas BS, Chaikof EL. Picture-cross-linking of sort I collagen gels within the presence of clean muscle cells: mechanical properties, cell viability, and performance. Biomacromolecules. 2003;4(4):890–5.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Hirai J, Matsuda T. Self-organized, tubular hybrid vascular tissue composed of vascular cells and collagen for low-pressure-loaded venous system. Cell Transplant. 1995;4(6):597–608.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Hu YH, Grainger DW, Winn SR, Hollinger JO. Fabrication of poly(alpha-hydroxy acid) foam scaffolds utilizing a number of solvent techniques. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;59(3):563–72.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Oh SH, Kang SG, Kim ES, Cho SH, Lee JH. Fabrication and characterization of hydrophilic poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/poly(vinyl alcohol) mix cell scaffolds by melt-molding particulate-leaching technique. Biomaterials. 2003;24(22):4011–21.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Thadavirul N, Pavasant P, Supaphol P. Improvement of polycaprolactone porous scaffolds by combining solvent casting, particulate leaching, and polymer leaching strategies for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(10):3379–92.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Salerno A, Fernandez-Gutierrez M, del Barrio JSR, Domingo C. Bio-safe fabrication of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue engineering by combining section separation, porogen leaching and scCO(2) drying. J Supercrit Fluid. 2015;97:238–46.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Ma PX, Choi JW. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds with well-defined interconnected spherical pore community. Tissue Eng. 2001;7(1):23–33.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Tan QG, Li SG, Ren J, Chen C. Fabrication of porous scaffolds with a controllable microstructure and mechanical properties by porogen fusion method. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(2):890–904.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Prabhakaran MP, Venugopal J, Ramakrishna S. Electrospun nanostructured scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(8):2884–93.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Park SH, Park DS, Shin JW, Kang YG, Kim HK, Yoon TR, et al. Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering fabricated from two completely different supplies by the speedy prototyping method: PCL versus PLGA. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(11):2671–8.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Mondrinos MJ, Dembzynski R, Lu L, Byrapogu VKC, Wootton DM, Lelkes PI, et al. Porogen-based stable freeform fabrication of polycaprolactone-calcium phosphate scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006;27(25):4399–408.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Intranuovo F, Gristina R, Brun F, Mohammadi S, Ceccone G, Sardella E, et al. Plasma modification of PCL porous scaffolds fabricated by solvent-casting/particulate leaching for tissue engineering. Plasma Course of Polym. 2014;11(2):184–95.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

von Arx T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Buser D. Analysis of a prototype trilayer membrane (PTLM) for lateral ridge augmentation: an experimental examine within the canine mandible. Int J Oral Max Surg. 2002;31(2):190–9.

Google Scholar 

Maquet V, Boccaccini AR, Pravata L, Notingher I, Jerome R. Porous poly(alpha-hydroxyacid)/bioglass composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. I: preparation and in vitro characterisation. Biomaterials. 2004;25(18):4185–94.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Shikinami Y, Matsusue Y, Nakamura T. The entire technique of bioresorption and bone substitute utilizing units manufactured from cast composites of uncooked hydroxyapatite particles/poly l-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA). Biomaterials. 2005;26(27):5542–51.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Sheikh FA, Ju HW, Moon BM, Lee OJ, Kim JH, Park HJ, et al. Hybrid scaffolds based mostly on PLGA and silk for bone tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016;10(3):209–21.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lei Y, Xu ZL, Ke QF, Yin WJ, Chen YX, Zhang CQ, et al. Strontium hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanohybrid scaffolds with enhanced osteoinductivity for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;72:134–42.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Huang BY, Caetano G, Vyas C, Blaker JJ, Diver C, Bartolo P. Polymer-ceramic composite scaffolds: the impact of hydroxyapatite and beta-tri-calcium phosphate. Supplies. 2018;11(1):129.

PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Backes EH, Fernandes EM, Diogo GS, Marques CF, Silva TH, Costa LC, et al. Engineering 3D printed bioactive composite scaffolds based mostly on the mixture of aliphatic polyester and calcium phosphates for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;122:111928.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Yamaoka T, Hotta Y, Kobayashi Okay, Kimura Y. Synthesis and properties of malic acid-containing useful polymers. Int J Biol Macromol. 1999;25(1–3):265–71.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kao CT, Lin CC, Chen YW, Yeh CH, Fang HY, Shie MY. Poly(dopamine) coating of 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;56:165–73.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Chen JP, Cheng TH. Thermo-responsive chitosan-graft-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) injectable hydrogel for cultivation of chondrocytes and meniscus cells. Macromol Biosci. 2006;6(12):1026–39.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Tan HP, Ramirez CM, Miljkovic N, Li H, Rubin JP, Marra KG. Thermosensitive injectable hyaluronic acid hydrogel for adipose tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30(36):6844–53.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Boucard N, Viton C, Agay D, Mari E, Roger T, Chancerelle Y, et al. Using bodily hydrogels of chitosan for pores and skin regeneration following third-degree burns. Biomaterials. 2007;28(24):3478–88.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Vilela CA, Correia C, da Silva MA, Santos TC, Gertrudes AC, Moreira ES, et al. In vitro and in vivo efficiency of methacrylated gellan gum hydrogel formulations for cartilage restore. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106(7):1987–96.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Weitkamp JT, Woltje M, Nusspickel B, Schmidt FN, Aibibu D, Bayer A, et al. Silk fiber-reinforced hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for cartilage tissue engineering. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):3635.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Zhu J, Marchant RE. Design properties of hydrogel tissue-engineering scaffolds. Professional Rev Med Gadgets. 2011;8(5):607–26.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Kim J, Kim IS, Cho TH, Lee KB, Hwang SJ, Tae G, et al. Bone regeneration utilizing hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel with bone morphogenic protein-2 and human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials. 2007;28(10):1830–7.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Sakai S, Hirose Okay, Taguchi Okay, Ogushi Y, Kawakami Okay. An injectable, in situ enzymatically gellable, gelatin spinoff for drug supply and tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2009;30(20):3371–7.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Tabriz AG, Hermida MA, Leslie NR, Shu WM. Three-dimensional bioprinting of complicated cell laden alginate hydrogel buildings. Biofabrication. 2015;7(4):045012.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wang YJ, Zhu W, Xiao Okay, Li Z, Ma Q, Li WF, et al. Self-healing and injectable hybrid hydrogel for bone regeneration of femoral head necrosis and defect. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;508(1):25–30.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Deshmukh M, Singh Y, Gunaseelan S, Gao DY, Stein S, Sinko PJ. Biodegradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels based mostly on a self-elimination degradation mechanism. Biomaterials. 2010;31(26):6675–84.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Zustiak SP, Leach JB. Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules. 2010;11(5):1348–57.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Kang HW, Lee SJ, Ko IK, Kengla C, Yoo JJ, Atala A. A 3D bioprinting system to provide human-scale tissue constructs with structural integrity. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34(3):312–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Wang XF, Music Y, Liu YS, Solar YC, Wang YG, Wang Y, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of three-dimensional bioprinted constructs consisting of human adipose-derived stem cells in vitro and in vivo. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(6):e0157214.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Qiu PC, Li MB, Chen Okay, Fang B, Chen PF, Tang ZB, et al. Periosteal matrix-derived hydrogel promotes bone restore by an early immune regulation coupled with enhanced angio- and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2020;227:119552.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Fellah BH, Weiss P, Gauthier O, Rouillon T, Pilet P, Daculsi G, et al. Bone restore utilizing a brand new injectable self-crosslinkable bone substitute. J Orthop Res. 2006;24(4):628–35.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kim S, Fan JB, Lee CS, Chen C, Bubukina Okay, Lee M. Heparinized chitosan stabilizes the bioactivity of BMP-2 and potentiates the osteogenic efficacy of demineralized bone matrix. J Biol Eng. 2020;14(1):6.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Benoit DSW, Anseth KS. Heparin functionalized PEG gels that modulate protein adsorption for hMSC adhesion and differentiation. Acta Biomater. 2005;1(4):461–70.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Benoit DSW, Durney AR, Anseth KS. The impact of heparin-functionalized PEG hydrogels on three-dimensional human mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials. 2007;28(1):66–77.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Tae G, Kim YJ, Choi WI, Kim M, Stayton PS, Hoffman AS. Formation of a novel heparin-based hydrogel within the presence of heparin-binding biomolecules. Biomacromolecules. 2007;8(6):1979–86.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kim HJ, You SJ, Yang DH, Eun J, Park HK, Kim MS, et al. Injectable hydrogels based mostly on MPEG-PCL-RGD and BMSCs for bone tissue engineering. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(15):4334–45.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Subbiah R, Cheng A, Ruehle MA, Hettiaratchi MH, Bertassoni LE, Guldberg RE. Results of managed twin progress issue supply on bone regeneration following composite bone-muscle damage. Acta Biomater. 2020;114:63–75.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Peng J, Zhao H, Tu CZ, Xu ZQ, Ye L, Zhao L, et al. In situ hydrogel dressing loaded with heparin and fundamental fibroblast progress issue for accelerating wound therapeutic in rat. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;116:111169.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Li C, Faulkner-Jones A, Dun AR, Jin J, Chen P, Xing YZ, et al. Fast formation of a supramolecular polypeptide-DNA hydrogel for in situ three-dimensional multilayer bioprinting. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2015;54(13):3957–61.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Ding HZ, Tourlomousis F, Chang RC. Bioprinting multidimensional constructs: a quantitative method to understanding printed cell density and redistribution phenomena. Biomed Phys Eng Specific. 2017;3(3):035016.

Google Scholar 

Campbell TA, Tibbits S, Garrett B. The following wave: 4D printing programming the fabric world. The Atlantic Council of america. 2014.

Skrzeszewska PJ, Jong LN, de Wolf FA, Stuart MAC, van der Gucht J. Form-memory results in biopolymer networks with collagen-like transient nodes. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12(6):2285–92.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Stroganov V, Al-Hussein M, Sommer JU, Janke A, Zakharchenko S, Ionov L. Reversible thermosensitive biodegradable polymeric actuators based mostly on confined crystallization. Nano Lett. 2015;15(3):1786–90.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Senatov FS, Niaza KV, Zadorozhnyy MY, Maksimkin AV, Kaloshkin SD, Estrin YZ. Mechanical properties and form reminiscence impact of 3D-printed PLA-based porous scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed. 2016;57:139–48.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Wang T, Chen LM, Shen TT, Wu DY. Preparation and properties of a novel thermo-sensitive hydrogel based mostly on chitosan/hydroxypropyl methylcellulose/glycerol. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;93:775–82.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Apsite I, Stoychev G, Zhang WZ, Jehnichen D, Xie J, Ionov L. Porous stimuli-responsive self-folding electrospun mats for 4D biofabrication. Biomacromolecules. 2017;18(10):3178–84.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Hendrikson WJ, Rouwkema J, Clementi F, van Blitterswijk CA, Fare S, Moroni L. In the direction of 4D printed scaffolds for tissue engineering: exploiting 3D form reminiscence polymers to ship time-controlled stimulus on cultured cells. Biofabrication. 2017;9(3):031001.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Naficy S, Gately R, Gorkin R, Xin H, Spinks GM. 4D Printing of reversible form morphing hydrogel buildings. Macromol Mater Eng. 2017;302(1):1600212.

Google Scholar 

Graham S, Marina PF, Blencowe A. Thermoresponsive polysaccharides and their thermoreversible bodily hydrogel networks. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;207:143–59.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Zhang LD, Liang HR, Jacob J, Naumov P. Photogated humidity-driven motility. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7429.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Griffin DR, Kasko AM. Photodegradable macromers and hydrogels for dwell cell encapsulation and launch. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134(31):13103–7.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Qin YP, Chen J, Bi Y, Xu XH, Zhou H, Gao JM, et al. Close to-infrared gentle remote-controlled intracellular anti-cancer drug supply utilizing thermo/pH delicate nanovehicle. Acta Biomater. 2015;17:201–9.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Arakawa CK, Badeau BA, Zheng Y, DeForest CA. Multicellular vascularized engineered tissues by user-programmable biomaterial photodegradation. Adv Mater. 2017;29(37):1703156.

Google Scholar 

Servant A, Leon V, Jasim D, Methven L, Limousin P, Fernandez-Pacheco EV, et al. Graphene-based electroresponsive scaffolds as polymeric implants for on-demand drug supply. Adv Healthc Mater. 2014;3(8):1334–43.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Lalitha Okay, Prasad YS, Sridharan V, Maheswari CU, John G, Nagarajan S. A renewable resource-derived thixotropic self-assembled supramolecular gel: magnetic stimuli responsive and real-time self-healing behaviour. RSC Adv. 2015;5(95):77589–94.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Zhang LN, Zuo XQ, Li SJ, Solar M, Xie HM, Zhang Okay, et al. Synergistic remedy of magnetism-responsive hydrogel for gentle tissue accidents. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:160–6.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Huebsch N, Kearney CJ, Zhao XH, Kim J, Cezar CA, Suo ZG, et al. Ultrasound-triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly cross-linked hydrogels for drug supply and enhanced chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(27):9762–7.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Eldin MSM, Kamoun EA, Sofan MA, Elbayomi SM. l-Arginine grafted alginate hydrogel beads: a novel pH-sensitive system for particular protein supply. Arab J Chem. 2015;8(3):355–65.

Google Scholar 

Nadgorny M, Xiao ZY, Chen C, Connal LA. Three-dimensional printing of pH-responsive and useful polymers on an reasonably priced desktop printer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(42):28946–54.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Bai T, Han YJ, Zhang P, Wang W, Liu WG. Zinc ion-triggered two-way macro-/microscopic form altering and reminiscence results in excessive power hydrogels with pre-programmed unilateral patterned surfaces. Comfortable Matter. 2012;8(25):6846–52.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Nan WJ, Wang W, Gao H, Liu WG. Fabrication of a form reminiscence hydrogel based mostly on imidazole-zinc ion coordination for potential cell-encapsulating tubular scaffold software. Comfortable Matter. 2013;9(1):132–7.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Ren ZQ, Zhang YY, Li YM, Xu B, Liu WG. Hydrogen bonded and ionically crosslinked excessive power hydrogels exhibiting Ca²⁺-triggered form reminiscence properties and quantity shrinkage for cell detachment. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3(30):6347–54.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Kirillova A, Maxson R, Stoychev G, Gomillion CT, Ionov L. 4D biofabrication utilizing shape-morphing hydrogels. Adv Mater. 2017;29(46):1703443.

Google Scholar 

Kuribayashi-Shigetomi Okay, Onoe H, Takeuchi S. Cell origami: self-folding of three-dimensional cell-laden microstructures pushed by cell traction drive. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(12):e51085.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Kim J, Park Y, Tae G, Lee KB, Hwang SJ, Kim IS, et al. Synthesis and characterization of matrix metalloprotease sensitive-low molecular weight hyaluronic acid based mostly hydrogels. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(11):3311–8.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Chen JP, Tsai MJ, Liao HT. Incorporation of biphasic calcium phosphate microparticles in injectable thermoresponsive hydrogel modulates bone cell proliferation and differentiation. Colloids Surf B. 2013;110:120–9.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Chen XH, Zhao YB, Geng SN, Miron RJ, Zhang Q, Wu CT, et al. In vivo experimental examine on bone regeneration in vital bone defects utilizing PIB nanogels/boron-containing mesoporous bioactive glass composite scaffold. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:839–46.

Google Scholar 

Demirtas TT, Irmak G, Gumusderelioglu M. A bioprintable type of chitosan hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Biofabrication. 2017;9(3):035003.

PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Parameswaran-Thankam A, Parnell CM, Watanabe F, RanguMagar AB, Chhetri BP, Szwedo PK, et al. Guar-based injectable thermoresponsive hydrogel as a scaffold for bone cell progress and managed drug supply. ACS Omega. 2018;3(11):15158–67.

CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Miao SD, Zhu W, Castro NJ, Leng JS, Zhang LG. 4-dimensional printing hierarchy scaffolds with extremely biocompatible sensible polymers for tissue engineering functions. Tissue Eng C. 2016;22(10):952–63.

CAS 

Google Scholar 

Luo ZY, Zhang SQ, Pan JJ, Shi R, Liu H, Lyu YL, et al. Time-responsive osteogenic area of interest of stem cells: a sequentially triggered, dual-peptide loaded, alginate hybrid system for selling cell exercise and osteo-differentiation. Biomaterials. 2018;163:25–42.

CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 

Tang YF, Wu C, Wu ZX, Hu L, Zhang W, Zhao Okay. Fabrication and in vitro organic properties of piezoelectric bioceramics for bone regeneration. Sci Rep. 2017;7:43360.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 

Devillard CD, Mandon CA, Lambert SA, Blum LJ, Marquette CA. Bioinspired multi-activities 4D printing objects: a brand new method towards complicated tissue engineering. Biotechnol J. 2018;13(12):1800098.

Google Scholar 

Miao S, Cui H, Nowicki M, Xia L, Zhou X, Lee SJ, et al. Stereolithographic 4D bioprinting of multiresponsive architectures for neural engineering. Adv Biosyst. 2018;2(9):1800101.

PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar