[ad_1]
Google’s John Mueller was requested whether it is helps after doing an enormous URL migration to maintain the outdated XML Sitemap file up for a bit. John stated “the impact can be minimal” through the use of this technique.
The idea is that should you depart the outdated XML sitemap reside for a bit, Google will look to it to crawl these URLs quicker after which decide up on the brand new URLs (those the outdated ones redirect to) quicker. However John stated it would not actually work that manner, he stated “should you change all of the dates on current pages, that does not give us a lot perception into the place to start out crawling, so I think total it could crawl as typical.” So regular crawling can be carried out on these outdated URLs and Google will decide up on the redirects in its regular crawl – the XML sitemap may not have an effect on that, at the very least a noticeable impression.
Listed here are these tweets:
@JohnMu Do you advocate conserving the outdated xml sitemap reside after a big URL construction migration, in order that bots nonetheless have entry to them and discover the brand new URLs faster through redirects?
— Daniel Lira (@DanielTexasLira) November 16, 2021
Quickly is ok, however I think the impact can be minimal (should you change all of the dates on current pages, that does not give us a lot perception into the place to start out crawling, so I think total it could crawl as typical)
— 🧀 John 🧀 (@JohnMu) November 17, 2021
It’s a good query as a result of Google, together with John Mueller, has stated previously that you should use Sitemaps to hurry up web page removals on some stage and it appears Gary Illyes from Google stated this may additionally work with URL migrations. So the query has logical sense however the response additionally does.
Discussion board dialogue at Twitter.
[ad_2]
