Friday, October 30, 2026
HomeNanotechnologyDynamic alteration of poroelastic attributes as determinant membrane nanorheology for endocytosis of...

Dynamic alteration of poroelastic attributes as determinant membrane nanorheology for endocytosis of organ particular focused gold nanoparticles | Journal of Nanobiotechnology

[ad_1]

  • 1.

    Sahai N, Ahmad N, Gogoi M. Nanoparticles primarily based drug supply for tissue regeneration utilizing biodegradable scaffolds: a evaluation. Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2018;6:219–24.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Ahmad N, Bhatnagar S, Dubey SD, Saxena R, Sharma S, Dutta R: Nanopackaging in meals and electronics. In: Nanoscience in meals and agriculture 4. Springer; 2017: 45–97

  • 3.

    Ahmad N, Gopinath P, Dutta R. 3D printing expertise in nanomedicine. Elsevier; 2019.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Pal Okay, Al-Suraih F, Gonzalez-Rodriguez R, Dutta SK, Wang E, Kwak HS, Caulfield TR, Coffer JL, Bhattacharya S. Multifaceted peptide assisted one-pot synthesis of gold nanoparticles for plectin-1 focused gemcitabine supply in pancreatic most cancers. Nanoscale. 2017;9:15622–34.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Singh R, Lillard JW Jr. Nanoparticle-based focused drug supply. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86:215–23.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 6.

    Paciotti GF, Kingston DG, Tamarkin L. Colloidal gold nanoparticles: a novel nanoparticle platform for creating multifunctional tumor-targeted drug supply vectors. Drug Dev Res. 2006;67:47–54.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Wu L, Xie W, Zan H-M, Liu Z, Wang G, Wang Y, Liu W, Dong W. Platelet membrane-coated nanoparticles for focused drug supply and native chemo-photothermal remedy of orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8:4648–59.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Ahmad N, Bhatnagar S, Ali SS, Dutta R. Phytofabrication of bioinduced silver nanoparticles for biomedical purposes. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:7019.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Khatoon A, Khan F, Ahmad N, Shaikh S, Rizvi SMD, Shakil S, Al-Qahtani MH, Abuzenadah AM, Tabrez S, Ahmed ABF. Silver nanoparticles from leaf extract of Mentha piperita: eco-friendly synthesis and impact on acetylcholinesterase exercise. Life Sci. 2018;209:430–4.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Ahmad N, Bhatnagar S, Saxena R, Iqbal D, Ghosh A, Dutta R. Biosynthesis and characterization of gold nanoparticles: kinetics, in vitro and in vivo research. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;78:553–64.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Ahmad N, Gopinath P. Clever nanomaterials for drug supply purposes. Elsevier; 2020.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Kulkarni T, Mukhopadhyay D, Bhattacharya S. Nanomechanical perception of pancreatic most cancers cell membrane throughout receptor mediated endocytosis of focused gold nanoparticles. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;4(1):484–94.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Mulens-Arias V, Balfourier A, Nicolás-Boluda A, Carn F, Gazeau F. Endocytosis-driven gold nanoparticle fractal rearrangement in cells and its affect on photothermal conversion. Nanoscale. 2020;12:21832–49.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    He Z, Liu Okay, Scally L, Manaloto E, Gunes S, Ng SW, Maher M, Tiwari B, Byrne HJ, Bourke P. Chilly atmospheric plasma stimulates clathrin-dependent endocytosis to restore oxidised membrane and improve uptake of nanomaterial in glioblastoma multiforme cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Enea M, Pereira E, Costa J, Soares ME, da Silva DD, de Lourdes BM, Carmo HF. Mobile uptake and toxicity of gold nanoparticles on two distinct hepatic cell fashions. Toxicol In Vitro. 2021;70:105046.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Ahlawat J, Guillama Barroso G, Masoudi Asil S, Alvarado M, Armendariz I, Bernal J, Carabaza X, Chavez S, Cruz P, Escalante V. Nanocarriers as potential drug supply candidates for overcoming the blood–mind barrier: challenges and potentialities. ACS Omega. 2020;5:12583–95.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Hoffman BD, Grashoff C, Schwartz MA. Dynamic molecular processes mediate mobile mechanotransduction. Nature. 2011;475:316–23.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Wernig F, Xu Q. Mechanical stress-induced apoptosis within the cardiovascular system. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2002;78:105–37.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Zhou G, Zhang B, Tang G, Yu X-F, Galluzzi M. Cells nanomechanics by atomic pressure microscopy: deal with interactions at nanoscale. Adv Phys X. 2021;6:1866668.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Jokhadar ŠZ, Iturri J, Toca-Herrera JL, Derganc J. Cell stiffness underneath small and huge deformations measured by optical tweezers and atomic pressure microscopy: results of actin disruptors CK-869 and jasplakinolide. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2021;54:124001.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 21.

    Li M, Xi N. Wang Y-c, Liu L-q: Atomic pressure microscopy for revealing micro/nanoscale mechanics in tumor metastasis: from single cells to microenvironmental cues. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2021;42:323–39.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Sahai N, Gogoi M, Ahmad N. Mathematical modeling and simulations for creating nanoparticle-based most cancers drug supply methods: a evaluation. Curr Pathobiol Rep. 2021;9(1):1–8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Liao Y-X, Zhang Z-P, Zhao J, Liu J-P. Results of fibronectin 1 on cell proliferation, senescence and apoptosis of human glioma cells by way of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48:1382–96.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Sanchez-Esteban J, Wang Y, Gruppuso PA, Rubin LP. Mechanical stretch induces fetal kind II cell differentiation by way of an epidermal progress issue receptor–extracellular-regulated protein kinase signaling pathway. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;30:76–83.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Wojcikiewicz EP, Zhang X, Moy VT. Power and compliance measurements on dwelling cells utilizing atomic pressure microscopy (AFM). Biol Proced On-line. 2004;6:1–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Guo X, Bonin Okay, Scarpinato Okay, Guthold M. The impact of neighboring cells on the stiffness of cancerous and non-cancerous human mammary epithelial cells. New J Phys. 2014;16:105002.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Solar T, Zhang YS, Pang B, Hyun DC, Yang M, Xia Y. Engineered nanoparticles for drug supply in most cancers remedy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:12320–64.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Aschenbrenner L, Naccache SN, Hasson T. Uncoated endocytic vesicles require the unconventional myosin, Myo6, for speedy transport by way of actin obstacles. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:2253–63.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Mofrad MR. Rheology of the cytoskeleton. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2009;41:433–53.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Ingber DE, Wang N, Stamenovic D. Tensegrity, mobile biophysics, and the mechanics of dwelling methods. Rep Prog Phys. 2014;77:046603.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 31.

    Hoffman BD, Crocker JC. Cell mechanics: dissecting the bodily responses of cells to pressure. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:259–88.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Sneddon IN. The relation between load and penetration within the axisymmetric Boussinesq downside for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci. 1965;3:47–57.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Hertz H. On the contact of inflexible elastic solids and on hardness, chapter 6: Assorted papers by H. Hertz. New York: MacMillan; 1882.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Packham D. Work of adhesion: contact angles and phone mechanics. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1996;16:121–8.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Barthel E. Adhesive elastic contacts: JKR and extra. J Phys D Appl Phys. 2008;41:163001.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Derjaguin BV, Muller VM, Toporov YP. Impact of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1975;53:314–26.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Fabry B, Maksym GN, Butler JP, Glogauer M, Navajas D, Fredberg JJ. Scaling the microrheology of dwelling cells. Phys Rev Lett. 2001;87:148102.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Fredberg JJ, Stamenovic D. On the imperfect elasticity of lung tissue. J Appl Physiol. 1985;1989(67):2408–19.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Hildebrandt J. Comparability of mathematical fashions for cat lung and viscoelastic balloon derived by Laplace remodel strategies from pressurevolume knowledge. Bull Math Biophys. 1969;31:651–67.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 40.

    Maksym GN, Fabry B, Butler JP, Navajas D, Tschumperlin DJ, Laporte JD, Fredberg JJ. Mechanical properties of cultured human airway clean muscle cells from 005 to 04 Hz. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:1619–32.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Mollaeian Okay, Liu Y, Bi S, Ren J. Atomic pressure microscopy research revealed velocity-dependence and nonlinearity of nanoscale poroelasticity of eukaryotic cells. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;78:65–73.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Bachrach NM, Valhmu WB, Stazzone E, Ratcliffe A, Lai WM, Mow VC. Adjustments in proteoglycan synthesis of chondrocytes in articular cartilage are related to the time-dependent adjustments of their mechanical surroundings. J Biomech. 1995;28:1561–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    Guilak F, Mow VC. The mechanical surroundings of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite factor mannequin of cell–matrix interactions in articular cartilage. J Biomech. 2000;33:1663–73.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Moeendarbary E, Valon L, Fritzsche M, Harris AR, Moulding DA, Thrasher AJ, Stride E, Mahadevan L, Charras GT. The cytoplasm of dwelling cells behaves as a poroelastic materials. Nat Mater. 2013;12:253–61.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Jauvert S, Peyroux R, Richefeu V. A mechanical mannequin for cell motility and tissue morphogenesis. Comput Strategies Biomech Biomed Engin. 2013;16:13–4.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    He DJ, Hu YH. A nonlinear visco-poroelasticity mannequin for transversely isotropic gels. Meccanica. 2020;56(6):1483–504.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Florea C, Tanska P, Mononen ME, Qu CJ, Lammi MJ, Laasanen MS, Korhonen RK. A mixed experimental atomic pressure microscopy-based nanoindentation and computational modeling method to unravel the important thing contributors to the time-dependent mechanical habits of single cells. Biomech Mannequin Mechanobiol. 2017;16:297–311.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Bonfanti A, Fouchard J, Khalilgharibi N, Charras G, Kabla A. A unified rheological mannequin for cells and cellularised supplies. R Soc Open Sci. 2020;7:190920.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Zhu X, Cirovic S, Shaheen A, Xu W. Investigation of fullerenol-induced adjustments in poroelasticity of human hepatocellular carcinoma by AFM-based creep exams. Biomech Mannequin Mechanobiol. 2018;17:665–74.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Mollaeian Okay, Liu Y, Ren J: Investigation of nanoscale poroelasticity of eukaryotic cells utilizing Atomic Power Microscopy. In ASME 2017 dynamic methods and management convention. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Assortment; 2017

  • 51.

    Kulkarni T, Tam A, Mukhopadhyay D, Bhattacharya S: AFM research: Cell cycle and probe geometry influences nanomechanical characterization of Panc1 cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Common Topics 2019; 1863:802–812.

  • 52.

    Herrmann H, Bar H, Kreplak L, Strelkov SV, Aebi U. Intermediate filaments: from cell structure to nanomechanics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:562–73.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    Mahaffy RE, Shih CK, MacKintosh FC, Kas J. Scanning probe-based frequency-dependent microrheology of polymer gels and organic cells. Phys Rev Lett. 2000;85:880–3.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Bausch D, Thomas S, Mino-Kenudson M, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Bauer TW, Williams M, Warshaw AL, Thayer SP, Kelly KA. Plectin-1 as a novel biomarker for pancreatic most cancers. Clin Most cancers Res. 2011;17:302–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Xu P, Liu H. Fashions of microfibril elastic modulus parallel to the cell axis. Wooden Sci Technol. 2004;38:363–74.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Lowery J, Kuczmarski ER, Herrmann H, Goldman RD. Intermediate filaments play a pivotal position in regulating cell structure and performance. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:17145–53.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Kim S, Coulombe PA. Intermediate filament scaffolds fulfill mechanical, organizational, and signaling features within the cytoplasm. Genes Dev. 2007;21:1581–97.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Sanghvi-Shah R, Weber GF. Intermediate filaments on the junction of mechanotransduction, migration, and growth. Entrance Cell Dev Biol. 2017;5:81.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Ingber DE. Tensegrity-based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2008;97:163–79.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Shin W, Ge L, Arpino G, Villarreal SA, Hamid E, Liu H, Zhao WD, Wen PJ, Chiang HC, Wu LG. Visualization of membrane pore in dwell cells reveals a dynamic-pore concept governing fusion and endocytosis. Cell. 2018;173(934–945):e912.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Wu LG, Hamid E, Shin W, Chiang HC. Exocytosis and endocytosis: modes, features, and coupling mechanisms. Annu Rev Physiol. 2014;76:301–31.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    Zhang X, Ren J, Wang J, Li S, Zou Q, Gao N. Receptor-mediated endocytosis generates nanomechanical pressure reflective of ligand id and mobile property. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233:5908–19.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    Chim YH, Mason LM, Rath N, Olson MF, Tassieri M, Yin H. A one-step process to probe the viscoelastic properties of cells by Atomic Power Microscopy. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–12.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Robinson MS, Watts C, Zerial M. Membrane dynamics in endocytosis. Cell. 1996;84:13–21.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Staszewska I, Fischer I, Wiche G. Plectin isoform 1-dependent nuclear docking of desmin networks impacts myonuclear structure and expression of mechanotransducers. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24:7373–89.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    Staunton JR, Fuhrmann A, Nandakumar V, Banyai N, Davies PCW, Ros R. AFM stiffness nanotomography of regular, metaplastic and dysplastic human esophageal cells. Biophys J. 2011;100:190–190.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Li QS, Lee GYH, Ong CN, Lim CT. AFM indentation research of breast most cancers cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;374:609–13.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Puech PH, Poole Okay, Knebel D, Muller DJ. A brand new technical method to quantify cell-cell adhesion forces by AFM. Ultramicroscopy. 2006;106:637–44.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Sen S, Subramanian S, Discher DE. Indentation and adhesive probing of a cell membrane with AFM: theoretical mannequin and experiments. Biophys J. 2005;89:3203–13.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Wei F, Lan F, Liu B, Liu LQ, Li GY. Poroelasticity of cell nuclei revealed by way of atomic pressure microscopy characterization. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;109:213701.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    Liu Y, Mollaeian Okay, Ren J. Finite factor modeling of dwelling cells for AFM indentation-based biomechanical characterization. Micron. 2019;116:108–15.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Kang T, Park C, Lee B-J. Investigation of biomimetic shear stress on mobile uptake and mechanism of polystyrene nanoparticles in varied most cancers cell traces. Arch Pharmacal Res. 2016;39:1663–70.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Kang T, Cho Y, Park C, Kim S-D, Oh E, Cui J-H, Cao Q-R, Lee B-J. Impact of biomimetic shear stress on intracellular uptake and cell-killing effectivity of doxorubicin in a free and liposomal formulation. Int J Pharm. 2016;510:42–7.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 74.

    Sivaramakrishnan S, Schneider JL, Sitikov A, Goldman RD, Ridge KM. Shear stress induced reorganization of the keratin intermediate filament community requires phosphorylation by protein kinase C ζ. Mol Biol Cell. 2009;20:2755–65.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 75.

    Kulkarni T, Angom RS, Das P, Bhattacharya S, Mukhopadhyay D: Nanomechanical insights: amyloid beta oligomer-induced senescent mind endothelial cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Biomembranes 2019; 1861:183061.

  • 76.

    Rodino-Janeiro BK, Gonzalez-Peteiro M, Ucieda-Somoza R, Gonzalez-Juanatey JR, Alvarez E. Glycated albumin, a precursor of superior glycation end-products, up-regulates NADPH oxidase and enhances oxidative stress in human endothelial cells: molecular correlate of diabetic vasculopathy. Diabetes-Metab Res Rev. 2010;26:550–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 77.

    Wang HF. Concept of linear poroelasticity with purposes to geomechanics and hydrogeology. Princeton College Press; 2017.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 78.

    Selvadurai A. Stationary harm modelling of poroelastic contact. Int J Solids Struct. 2004;41:2043–64.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 79.

    Detournay E, Cheng AH-D: Fundamentals of poroelasticity. In Evaluation and design strategies. Elsevier; 1993: 113–171

  • 80.

    Hu Y, Zhao X, Vlassak JJ, Suo Z. Utilizing indentation to characterize the poroelasticity of gels. Appl Phys Lett. 2010;96:121904.


    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    RELATED ARTICLES

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments