Sunday, November 8, 2026
HomeNanotechnologyIn direction of utility of CRISPR-Cas12a within the design of contemporary viral...

In direction of utility of CRISPR-Cas12a within the design of contemporary viral DNA detection instruments (Evaluate) | Journal of Nanobiotechnology

[ad_1]

  • 1.

    Breitbart M, Rohwer F. Right here a virus, there a virus, in all places the identical virus? Traits Microbiol. 2005;5:278–84.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 2.

    Liu DJ, Day LA. Pf1 virus construction: Helical coat protein and DNA with paraxial phosphates. Science. 1994;265:671–4.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 3.

    Day AG, Bejarano ER, Buck KW, Burrell M, Lichtenstein CP. Expression of an antisense viral gene in transgenic tobacco confers resistance to the DNA virus tomato golden mosaic virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:6721–5.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 4.

    Bochkarev A, Barawell JA, Pfuetzner RA, Bochkareva E, Frappier L, Edwards AM. Crystal construction of the DNA-binding area of the Epstein-Barr virus origin-binding protein, EBNA1, sure to DNA. Cell. 1996;84:791–800.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 5.

    Koonin EV, Senkevich TG, Dolja VV. Biology Direct The traditional Virus World and evolution of cells. 2006; http://www.biology-direct.com/content material/1/1/29

  • 6.

    Lawrence CM, Menon S, Eilers BJ, Bothner B, Khayat R, Douglas T, et al. Structural and practical research of archaeal viruses. J Biol Chem. 2009;8:12599–603.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 7.

    Chisari FV, Ferrari C, Mondelli MU. Hepatitis B virus construction and biology. Microb Pathog. 1989;23:311–25.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 8.

    Liu S, Knafels JD, Chang JS, Waszak GA, Baldwin ET, Deibel MR, et al. Crystal construction of the herpes simplex virus 1 DNA polymerase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:18193–200.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 9.

    Noueiry AO, Lucas WJ, Gilbertson RL. Two proteins of a plant DNA virus coordinate nuclear and plasmodesmal transport. Cell. 1994;76:925–32.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 10.

    Baker TS, Olson NH, Fuller SD. Including the third dimension to virus life cycles: three-dimensional reconstruction of icosahedral viruses from cryo-electron micrographs. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:237–237.

    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 11.

    Iyer LM, Balaji S, Koonin EV, Aravind L. Evolutionary genomics of nucleo-cytoplasmic giant DNA viruses. Virus Res. 2006;117:156–84.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 12.

    Ivanovsky DI, Beijerinck MW. Bacteriol Rev. 1972;36:135–45.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 13.

    Lwoff A, Horne R, Tournier P. A system of viruses. Chilly Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1962;27:51–5.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 14.

    Fauquet CM, Fargette D. Worldwide Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses and the three,142 unassigned species. Virol J. 2005;2:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-2-64.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 15.

    Dronina J, Bubniene US, Ramanavicius A. The appliance of DNA polymerases and Cas9 as consultant of DNA-modifying enzymes group in DNA sensor design (evaluate). Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;45:112867.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 16.

    Payne S. Introduction to DNA Viruses Viruses. 2017;97:231–6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 17.

    Jiang D. ssDNA Mycoviruses. Reference Module in Life Sciences. New York: Elsevier; 2020.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 18.

    Sanjuán R, Pereira-Gómez M, Risso J. Genome Instability in DNA Viruses Genome Stability: From Virus to Human Software. New York: Elsevier Inc.; 2016. p. 37–47.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 19.

    Bhaya D, Davison M, Barrangou R. CRISPR-cas methods in micro organism and archaea: Versatile small RNAs for adaptive protection and regulation. Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45:273–97.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 20.

    Knobler CM, Gelbart WM. Bodily Chemistry of DNA Viruses. 2009; www.annualreviews.org

  • 21.

    Ng TFF, Manire C, Borrowman Ok, Langer T, Ehrhart L, Breitbart M. Discovery of a Novel Single-Stranded DNA Virus from a Sea Turtle Fibropapilloma by Utilizing Viral Metagenomics. J Virol. 2009;83:2500–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 22.

    Xie Q, Suárez-López P, Gutiérrez C. Identification and evaluation of a retinoblastoma binding motif within the replication protein of a plant DNA virus: requirement for environment friendly viral DNA replication. EMBO J. 1995;14:4073–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00079.x.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 23.

    Bamford DH, Grimes JM, Stuart DI. What does construction inform us about virus evolution? Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005;9:655–63.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 24.

    Tang L, Johnson JE. Structural biology of viruses by the mix of electron cryomicroscopy and x-ray crystallography. Biochemistry. 2002;9:11517–24.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 25.

    Wynne SA, Crowther RA, Leslie AGW. The crystal construction of the human hepatitis B virus capsid. Mol Cell Cell Press. 1999;3:771–80.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 26.

    Bronkhorst AW, van Cleef KWR, Vodovar N, Agah I, Ince H, Blanc H, et al. The DNA virus Invertebrate iridescent virus 6 is a goal of the Drosophila RNAi equipment. PNAS. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207213109.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 27.

    Grünewald Ok, Desai P, Winkler DC, Heymann JB, Belnap DM, Baumeister W, et al. Three-dimensional construction of herpes simplex virus from cryo-electron tomography. Science. 2003;302:1396–8.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 28.

    Lodish H, Berk A, Zipursky SL, Matsudaira P, Baltimore D, Darnell J. Molecular Cell Biology. 4th ed. W. H: Freeman; 2000.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 29.

    Solar Y, Parker MH, Weigele P, Casjens S, Prevelige PE, Krishna NR. Construction of the coat protein-binding area of the scaffolding protein from a double-stranded DNA virus. J Mol Biol. 2000;297:1195–202.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 30.

    Maul GG. Nuclear area 10, the location of DNA virus transcription and replication. BioEssays. 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199808)20:8<660::AID-BIES9>3.0.CO;2-M

  • 31.

    Kraberger S, Cook dinner CN, Schmidlin Ok, Fontenele RS, Bautista J, Smith B, et al. Numerous single-stranded DNA viruses related to honey bees (Apis mellifera). Infect Genet Evol. 2019;71:179–88.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 32.

    Fay N, Panté N. Nuclear entry of DNA viruses. Entrance Microbiol. 2015;6:467.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 33.

    Caspr DL, Klug A. Bodily ideas within the building of standard viruses. Chilly Spring Harbor Symposia Quant Biol. 1962;27:1–24.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 34.

    Gompels UA, Nicholas J, Lawrence G, Jones M, Thomson BJ, Martin MED, et al. The DNA sequence of human herpesvirus-6: construction, coding content material, and genome evolution. Virology. 1995;209:29–51.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 35.

    Straus SE, Aulakh HS, Ruyechan WT, Hay J, Casey TA, vande Woude GF, et al. Construction of varicella-zoster virus DNA. J Virol. 1981;40:9.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 36.

    Fukuchi Ok, Sudo M, Lee YS, Tanaka A, Nonoyama M. Construction of Marek’s illness virus DNA: detailed restriction enzyme map. J Virol. 1984;51:102–5.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 37.

    Higuchi R, Fockler C, Dollinger G, Watson R. Kinetic PCR evaluation: Actual-time monitoring of DNA amplification reactions. Bio/Know-how. 1993;11:1026–30.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 38.

    Straiton J, Free T, Sawyer A, Martin J. From Sanger sequencing to genome databases and past. BioTechniques Future Science. 2019;66:60–3. https://doi.org/10.2144/btn-2019-0011.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 39.

    Behjati S, Tarpey PS. What’s subsequent era sequencing? Archives of Illness in Childhood: Training and Observe Version. BMJ Publishing Group; 2013 [cited 2020 Nov 30];98:236–8. /pmc/articles/PMC3841808/?report=summary

  • 40.

    Engvall E, Perlmann P. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay. Elisa. J Immunol. 1972;109:8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 41.

    Cheng TY, Buckley A, van Geelen A, Lager Ok, Henao-Díaz A, Poonsuk Ok, et al. Detection of pseudorabies virus antibody in swine oral fluid utilizing a serum whole-virus oblique ELISA. J Veter Diagn Make investments. 2020;32:535–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1040638720924386.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 42.

    Johansson Ö, Ullman Ok, Lkhagvajav P, Wiseman M, Malmsten J, Leijon M. Detection and genetic characterization of viruses current in free-ranging snow leopards utilizing next-generation sequencing. Entrance Veter Sci. 2020;7:645. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00645/full.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 43.

    van Boheemen S, van Rijn AL, Pappas N, Carbo EC, Vorderman RHP, Sidorov I, et al. Retrospective validation of a metagenomic sequencing protocol for mixed detection of RNA and DNA viruses utilizing respiratory samples from pediatric sufferers. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22:196–207.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 44.

    Dhamad AE, Abdal Rhida MA. COVID-19: Molecular and serological detection strategies. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10180.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 45.

    Chakraborty I, Maity P. COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, results on society, world surroundings and prevention. Sci Whole Environ. 2020;728:138882.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 46.

    Morkvenaite-Vilkonciene I, Ramanaviciene A, Kisieliute A, Bucinskas V, Ramanavicius A. Scanning electrochemical microscopy within the growth of enzymatic sensors and immunosensors. Biosens Bioelectr. 2019;8:111411.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 47.

    Gomes NO, Carrilho E, Machado SAS, Sgobbi LF. Bacterial cellulose-based electrochemical sensing platform: A wise materials for miniaturized biosensors. Electrochim Acta. 2020;349:89.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 48.

    Tarhan T, Ulu A, Sariçam M, Çulha M, Ates B. Maltose functionalized magnetic core/shell Fe 3 O 4 @Au nanoparticles for an environment friendly L-asparaginase immobilization. Immune. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.09.116.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 49.

    Yong Y, Bai Y, Li YF, Lin L, Cui Y, Xia C. Preparation and utility of polymer-grafted magnetic nanoparticles for lipase immobilization. J Magn Magn Mater. 2008;320:2350–5.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 50.

    Popov A, Brasiunas B, Damaskaite A, Plikusiene I, Ramanavicius A, Ramanaviciene A. Electrodeposited Gold Nanostructures for the Enhancement of Electrochromic Properties of PANI–PEDOT Movie Deposited on Clear Electrode. Polymers. 2020;12:2778.

    CAS 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 51.

    Zhang H, Hua SF, Li C, Zhang L, Fan YC, Duan P. Impact of graphene oxide with completely different morphological traits on properties of immobilized enzyme within the covalent methodology. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2020;23:6.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 52.

    Barkauskas J, Mikoliunaite L, Paklonskaite I, Genys P, Petroniene JJ, Morkvenaite-Vilkonciene I, et al. Single-walled carbon nanotube based mostly coating modified with diminished graphene oxide for the design of amperometric biosensors. Mater Sci Eng. 2019;98:515–23.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 53.

    German N, Popov A, Ramanaviciene A, Ramanavicius A. Enzymatic formation of polyaniline, polypyrrole, and polythiophene nanoparticles with embedded glucose oxidase. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:806.

    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 54.

    Li Y, Li S, Wang J, Liu G. CRISPR/Cas Programs in the direction of Subsequent-Technology Biosensing. Traits Biotechnol. 2019;8:730–43.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 55.

    Li Z, Sheng W, Liu Q, Li S, Shi Y, Zhang Y, et al. Growth of a gold nanoparticle enhanced enzyme linked immunosorbent assay based mostly on monoclonal antibodies for the detection of fumonisin B1, B2, and B3 in maize. Anal Strategies. 2018;10:3506–13.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 56.

    Li J, Li Y, Zhai X, Cao Y, Zhao J, Tang Y, et al. Delicate electrochemical detection of hepatitis C virus subtype based mostly on nucleotides assisted magnetic diminished graphene oxide-copper nano-composite. Electrochem Commun. 2020;110:8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 57.

    Kausaite-Minkstimiene A, Glumbokaite L, Ramanaviciene A, Dauksaite E, Ramanavicius A. An amperometric glucose biosensor based mostly on poly (pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid)/glucose oxidase biocomposite. Electroanalysis. 2018;30:1642–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201800044.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 58.

    Newman JD, Setford SJ. Enzymatic biosensors. Mol Biotechnol. 2006;989:249–68. https://doi.org/10.1385/MB:32:3:249.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 59.

    Rapp BE, Gruhl FJ, Länge Ok. Biosensors with label-free detection designed for diagnostic purposes. Analyt Bioanalyt Chem. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3906-2.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 60.

    Nishida H, Kajisa T, Miyazawa Y, Tabuse Y, Yoda T, Takeyama H, et al. Self-oriented immobilization of DNA polymerase tagged by titanium-binding peptide motif. Langmuir. 2015;31:732–40.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 61.

    Pingarrón JM, Yáñez-Sedeño P, González-Cortés A. Gold nanoparticle-based electrochemical biosensors. Electrochim Acta. 2008;53:5848–66.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 62.

    German N, Popov A, Ramanaviciene A, Ramanavicius A. Formation and electrochemical characterisation of enzyme-assisted formation of polypyrrole and polyaniline nanocomposites with embedded glucose oxidase and gold nanoparticles. J Electrochem Soc. 2020;167:165501. https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abc9dc.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 63.

    Shmakov S, Smargon A, Scott D, Cox D, Pyzocha N, Yan W, et al. Variety and evolution of sophistication 2 CRISPR-Cas methods. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15:169–82.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 64.

    Burstein D, Harrington LB, Strutt SC, Probst AJ, Anantharaman Ok, Thomas BC, et al. New CRISPR-Cas methods from uncultivated microbes. Nature. 2017;542:237–41.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 65.

    Murugan Ok, Babu Ok, Sundaresan R, Rajan R. Sashital DG. The Revolution Continues: Newly Found Programs Develop the CRISPR-Cas Toolkit. Molecular Cell. Cell Press; 2017. p. 15–25.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 66.

    McMahon MA, Prakash TP, Cleveland DW, Bennett CF, Rahdar M. Chemically Modified Cpf1-CRISPR RNAs mediate environment friendly genome modifying in mammalian cells. Mol Remedy. 2018;26:1228–40.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 67.

    Jansen R, van Embden JDA, Gaastra W, Schouls LM. Identification of genes which are related to DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:1565–75. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02839.x.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 68.

    Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino Ok, Amemura M, Nakatura A. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, liable for alkaline phosphatase isoenzyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:5429–33.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 69.

    Ishino Y, Krupovic M, Forterre P. Historical past of CRISPR-Cas from encounter with a mysterious repeated sequence to genome modifying expertise. J Bacteriol. 2018;200:17.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 70.

    Garcia-Doval C, Jinek M. Molecular architectures and mechanisms of Class 2 CRISPR-associated nucleases. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2017;7:157–66.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 71.

    van der Oost J, Westra ER, Jackson RN, Wiedenheft B. Unravelling the structural and mechanistic foundation of CRISPR-Cas methods. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;9:479–92.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 72.

    Sorek R, Lawrence CM, Wiedenheft B. CRISPR-Mediated Adaptive Immune Programs in Micro organism and Archaea. Ann Rev Biochem. 2013;82:237–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-072911-172315.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 73.

    Barrangou R, Fremaux C, Deveau H, Richards M, Boyaval P, Moineau S, et al. CRISPR gives acquired resistance towards viruses in prokaryotes. Science. 2007;315:1709–12.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 74.

    Mohanraju P, Makarova KS, Zetsche B, Zhang F, Koonin E v., van der Oost J. Numerous evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas methods. Science. 2016. http://science.sciencemag.org/. Accessed 16 Nov 2020.

  • 75.

    Shmakov S, Abudayyeh OO, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Gootenberg JS, Semenova E, et al. Discovery and Purposeful Characterization of Numerous Class 2 CRISPR-Cas Programs. Mol Cell. 2015;60:385–97.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 76.

    Brouns SJJ, Jore MM, Lundgren M, Westra ER, Slijkhuis RJH, Snijders APL, et al. Small CRISPR RNAs information antiviral protection in prokaryotes. Science. 2008;321:960–4.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 77.

    McGinn J, Marraffini LA. Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR–Cas spacer acquisition. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;16:7–12.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 78.

    Yan F, Wang W, Zhang J. CRISPR-Cas12 and Cas13: the lesser identified siblings of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10565-019-09489-1.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 79.

    Sasnauskas G, Siksnys V. CRISPR adaptation from a structural perspective. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2020;23:17–25.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 80.

    Gasiunas G, Sinkunas T, Siksnys V. Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-013-1438-6.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 81.

    Sapranauskas R, Gasiunas G, Fremaux C, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. The Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR/Cas system gives immunity in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:9275–82.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 82.

    Wilkinson M, Drabavicius G, Silanskas A, Gasiunas G, Siksnys V, Wigley DB. Construction of the DNA-Sure Spacer Seize Advanced of a Sort II CRISPR-Cas System. Mol Cell. 2019;75:90-101.e5.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 83.

    Faure G, Shmakov SA, Yan WX, Cheng DR, Scott DA, Peters JE, et al. CRISPR–Cas in cell genetic parts: counter-defence and past. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:513–25.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 84.

    Gasiunas G, Younger JK, Karvelis T, Kazlauskas D, Urbaitis T, Jasnauskaite M, et al. A listing of biochemically numerous CRISPR-Cas9 orthologs. Nat Commun. 2020;11:5512.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 85.

    Glemzaite M, Balciunaite E, Karvelis T, Gasiunas G, Grusyte M, Alzbutas G, et al. Focused gene modifying by transfection of in vitro reconstituted streptococcus thermophilus cas9 nuclease advanced. RNA Biol. 2015;12:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2015.1017209.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 86.

    Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, Costa F, Shah SA, Saunders SJ, et al. An up to date evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas methods. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:722–36.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 87.

    Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein advanced mediates particular DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in micro organism. Micro organism. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208507109.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 88.

    Müller M, Lee CM, Gasiunas G, Davis TH, Cradick TJ, Siksnys V, et al. Streptococcus thermophilus CRISPR-Cas9 methods allow particular modifying of the human genome. Mol Ther. 2016;24:636–44.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 89.

    Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Iranzo J, Shmakov SA, Alkhnbashi OS, Brouns SJJ, et al. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas methods: a burst of sophistication 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;8:67–83.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 90.

    Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein advanced mediates particular DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in micro organism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E2579–86. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1208507109.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 91.

    Schindele P, Wolter F, Puchta H. Reworking plant biology and breeding with CRISPR/Cas9, Cas12 and Cas13. FEBS Lett. 2018;592:1954–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13073percent4010.1002/%28ISSNpercent291873-3468.opinions.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 92.

    McMahon MA, Rahdar M, Porteus M. Gene modifying: Not only for translation anymore. Nat Strategies. 2012. p. 28–31. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.1811

  • 93.

    Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, et al. Multiplex Genome Engineering Utilizing CRISPR/Cas Programs. Science. 2013;339:819–23.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 94.

    Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, et al. RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering by way of Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 95.

    Doudna JA, Charpentier E. The brand new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science. 2014;346:89.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 96.

    Louwen R, Staals RHJ, Endtz HP, van Baarlen P, van der Oost J. The Position of CRISPR-Cas methods in virulence of pathogenic micro organism. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2014;78:74–88.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 97.

    Zhang F, Wen Y, Guo X. CRISPR/Cas9 for genome modifying: Progress, implications and challenges. Hum Mol Genetics. 2014;23:R40–6.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 98.

    Sternberg SH, Doudna JA. Increasing the Biologist’s Toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9. Mol Cell. 2015;2:568–74.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 99.

    Hsu PD, Lander ES, Zhang F. Growth and purposes of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell. 2014;23:1262–78.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 100.

    Hur JK, Kim Ok, Been KW, Baek G, Ye S, Hur JW, et al. Focused mutagenesis in mice by electroporation of Cpf1 ribonucleoproteins. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;8:807–8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 101.

    Kim Y, Cheong SA, Lee JG, Lee SW, Lee MS, Baek IJ, et al. Technology of knockout mice by Cpf1-mediated gene focusing on. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;8:808–10.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 102.

    Platt RJ, Chen S, Zhou Y, Yim MJ, Swiech L, Kempton HR, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome modifying and most cancers modeling. Cell Cell Press. 2014;159:440–55.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 103.

    Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, et al. In vivo genome modifying utilizing Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature. 2015;520:186–91.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 104.

    Liang P, Xu Y, Zhang X, Ding C, Huang R, Zhang Z, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene modifying in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein Cell. 2015;6:363–72.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 105.

    Schmidt H, Collier TC, Hanemaaijer MJ, Houston PD, Lee Y, Lanzaro GC. Abundance of conserved CRISPR-Cas9 goal websites throughout the extremely polymorphic genomes of Anopheles and Aedes mosquitoes. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15204-0.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 106.

    Macias VM, McKeand S, Chaverra-Rodriguez D, Hughes GL, Fazekas A, Pujhari S, et al. Cas9-Mediated Gene-Modifying within the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles stephensi by ReMOT Management. G3 (Bethesda Md). 2020;10:1353–60. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.120.401133.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 107.

    Adelman ZN, Tu Z. Management of Mosquito-Borne Infectious Illnesses: Intercourse and Gene Drive. Traits Parasitol. 2016;9:219–29.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 108.

    Chaverra-Rodriguez D, Macias VM, Hughes GL, Pujhari S, Suzuki Y, Peterson DR, et al. Focused supply of CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein into arthropod ovaries for heritable germline gene modifying. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1–11.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 109.

    Hegde S, Nilyanimit P, Kozlova E, Anderson ER, Narra HP, Sahni SK, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene deletion of the ompA gene in symbiotic Cedecea neteri impairs biofilm formation and reduces intestine colonization of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019;13:e0007883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007883.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 110.

    Burstein D, Harrington LB, Strutt SC, Probst AJ, Anantharaman Ok, Thomas BC, et al. New CRISPR–Cas methods from uncultivated microbes. Nature. 2016;542:237–41.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 111.

    Fernandez JP, Vejnar CE, Giraldez AJ, Rouet R, Moreno-Mateos MA. Optimized CRISPR-Cpf1 system for genome modifying in zebrafish. Strategies. 2018;150:11–8.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 112.

    Vejnar CE, Moreno-Mateos MA, Cifuentes D, Bazzini AA, Giraldez AJ. Optimized CRISPR-Cas9 system for genome modifying in zebrafish. Chilly Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016:856–70.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 113.

    Zhang Y, Qin W, Lu X, Xu J, Huang H, Bai H, et al. Programmable base modifying of zebrafish genome utilizing a modified CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1–5.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 114.

    Liu Z, Chen S, Jin X, Wang Q, Yang Ok, Li C, et al. Genome modifying of the HIV co-receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 by CRISPR-Cas9 protects CD4+ T cells from HIV-1 an infection. Cell Bioscience. 2017;7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-017-0174-2.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 115.

    Park RJ, Wang T, Koundakjian D, Hultquist JF, Lamothe-Molina P, Monel B, et al. A genome-wide CRISPR display identifies a restricted set of HIV host dependency components. Nat Genet. 2017;49:193–203.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 116.

    Kaminski R, Chen Y, Fischer T, Tedaldi E, Napoli A, Zhang Y, et al. Elimination of HIV-1 Genomes from Human T-lymphoid Cells by CRISPR/Cas9 Gene Modifying. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–15.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 117.

    Jamehdor S, Zaboli KA, Naserian S, Thekkiniath J, Omidy HA, Teimoori A, et al. An summary of purposes of CRISPR-Cas applied sciences in biomedical engineering. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2020;8:163–73.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 118.

    Chai N, Haney MS, Couthouis J, Morgens DW, Benjamin A, Wu Ok, et al. Genome-wide artificial deadly CRISPR display identifies FIS1 as a genetic interactor of ALS-linked C9ORF72. Mind Res. 2020;1728:146601.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 119.

    Ledford H, Callaway E. Pioneers of revolutionary CRISPR gene modifying win chemistry Nobel. Nature. 2020;8:346–7.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 120.

    Barrangou R. The roles of CRISPR-Cas methods in adaptive immunity and past. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;23:36–41.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 121.

    Li SY, Cheng QX, Li XY, Zhang ZL, Gao S, Cao RB, et al. CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted nucleic acid detection. Cell Discovery: Nature Publishing Teams; 2018.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 122.

    Yamano T, Nishimasu H, Zetsche B, Hirano H, Slaymaker IM, Li Y, et al. Crystal Construction of Cpf1 in Advanced with Information RNA and Goal DNA. Cell. 2016;165:949–62.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 123.

    Dong D, Ren Ok, Qiu X, Zheng J, Guo M, Guan X, et al. The crystal construction of Cpf1 in advanced with CRISPR RNA. Nature. 2016;532:522–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 124.

    Safari F, Zare Ok, Negahdaripour M, Barekati-Mowahed M, Ghasemi Y. CRISPR Cpf1 proteins: Construction, perform and implications for genome modifying. Cell Biosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-019-0298-7.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 125.

    Jiménez A, Hoff B, Revuelta JL. Multiplex genome modifying in Ashbya gossypii utilizing CRISPR-Cpf1. New Biotechnol. 2020;57:29–33.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 126.

    Swarts DC, Jinek M. Cas9 versus Cas12a/Cpf1: Construction-function comparisons and implications for genome modifying. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2018;9:e1481. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrna.1481.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 127.

    Wang J, Zhang C, Feng B. The quickly advancing Class 2 CRISPR-Cas applied sciences: A customizable toolbox for molecular manipulations. J Cell Mol Med. 2020;24:3256–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15039.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 128.

    Gao L, Cox T, Yan WX, Manteiga JC, Schneider MW, Yamano T, et al. Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities. Nature. 2017;35:8.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 129.

    Tao D, Liu J, Nie X, Xu B, Tran-Thi TN, Niu L, et al. Software of CRISPR-Cas12a enhanced fluorescence assay coupled with nucleic acid amplification for the delicate detection of african swine fever virus. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9:2339–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.0c00057.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 130.

    Gao P, Yang H, Rajashankar KR, Huang Z, Patel DJ. Sort v CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 endonuclease employs a singular mechanism for crRNA-mediated goal DNA recognition. Cell Res. 2016;26:901–13.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 131.

    Hirano S, Nishimasu H, Ishitani R, Nureki O. Structural Foundation for the Altered PAM Specificities of Engineered CRISPR-Cas9. Mol Cell. 2016;61:886–94.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 132.

    Yamano T, Zetsche B, Ishitani R, Zhang F, Nishimasu H, Nureki O. Structural foundation for the canonical and non-canonical PAM Recognition by CRISPR-Cpf1. Mol Cell. 2017;67:633-645.e3.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 133.

    Tu M, Lin L, Cheng Y, He X, Solar H, Xie H, et al. A brand new lease of life’: FnCpf1 possesses DNA cleavage exercise for genome modifying in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:11295–304.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 134.

    Fonfara I, Richter H, BratoviÄ M, le Rhun A, Charpentier E. The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 additionally processes precursor CRISPR RNA. Nature. 2016;532:517–21.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 135.

    Zetsche B, Heidenreich M, Mohanraju P, Fedorova I, Kneppers J, Degennaro EM, et al. Multiplex gene modifying by CRISPR-Cpf1 utilizing a single crRNA array. Nat Biotechnol 2017. p. 31–4. https://www.nature.com/articles/nbt.3737

  • 136.

    Strohkendl I, Saifuddin FA, Rybarski JR, Finkelstein IJ, Russell R. Kinetic Foundation for DNA Goal Specificity of CRISPR-Cas12a. Mol Cell. 2018;71:816-824.e3.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 137.

    Kim HJ, Oh SY, Lee SJ. Single-base genome modifying in Corynebacterium glutamicum with the assistance of detrimental choice by target-mismatched CRISPR/Cpf1. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;30:1583–91. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.2006.06036.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 138.

    Li B, Liang S, Alariqi M, Wang F, Wang G, Wang Q, et al. The appliance of temperature sensitivity CRISPR/LbCpf1 (LbCas12a) mediated genome modifying in allotetraploid cotton (G. hirsutum) and creation of nontransgenic, gossypol-free cotton. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13470.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 139.

    Swarts DC. Making the reduce(s): How Cas12a cleaves goal and non-target DNA. Biochemical Society Transactions. Portland Press Ltd; 2019. p. 1499–510. /biochemsoctrans/article/47/5/1499/220695/Making-the-cut-s-how-Cas12a-cleaves-target-and-non

  • 140.

    Singh D, Mallon J, Poddar A, Wang Y, Tippana R, Yang O, et al. Actual-time commentary of DNA goal interrogation and product launch by the RNA-guided endonuclease CRISPR Cpf1 (Cas12a). PNAS. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718686115.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 141.

    Chen JS, Ma E, Harrington LB, da Costa M, Tian X, Palefsky JM, et al. CRISPR-Cas12a goal binding unleashes indiscriminate single-stranded DNase exercise. Science. 2018;360:436–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 142.

    Nguyen LT, Smith BM, Jain PK. Enhancement of trans-cleavage exercise of Cas12a with engineered crRNA allows amplified nucleic acid detection. Nat Commun. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18615-1.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 143.

    Swarts DC, Jinek M. Mechanistic Insights into the cis- and trans-Performing DNase Actions of Cas12a. Mol Cell. 2019;73:589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.021.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 144.

    Li SY, Cheng QX, Liu JK, Nie XQ, Zhao GP, Wang J. CRISPR-Cas12a has each cis- and trans-cleavage actions on single-stranded DNA. Cell Res. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 145.

    Wang X, Chen X, Chu C, Deng Y, Yang M, Ji Z, et al. 4-stage sign amplification for hint ATP detection utilizing allosteric probe-conjugated strand displacement and CRISPR/Cpf1 trans-cleavage (ASD-Cpf1). Sens Actuat Chem. 2020;323:128653.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 146.

    Zhao N, Li L, Luo G, Xie S, Lin Y, Han S, et al. Multiplex gene modifying and enormous DNA fragment deletion by the CRISPR/Cpf1-RecE/T system in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;47:599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-020-02304-5.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 147.

    Hao W, Suo F, Lin Q, Chen Q, Zhou L, Liu Z, et al. Design and building of moveable CRISPR-Cpf1-mediated genome modifying in bacillus subtilis 168 oriented towards a number of utilities. Entrance Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:524676. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.524676/full.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 148.

    Hochstrasser ML, Doudna JA. Reducing it shut: CRISPR-associated endoribonuclease construction and performance. Traits Biochem Sci. 2015;8:58–66.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 149.

    Smith CW, Nandu N, Kachwala MJ, Chen YS, Uyar TB, Yigit MV. Probing CRISPR-Cas12a nuclease exercise utilizing double-stranded DNA-templated fluorescent substrates. Biochemistry. 2020;59:1474–81.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 150.

    Zetsche B, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Slaymaker IM, Makarova KS, Essletzbichler P, et al. Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System. Cell Cell Press. 2015;163:759–71.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 151.

    Kim D, Kim J, Hur JK, Been KW, Yoon SH, Kim JS. Genome-wide evaluation reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nature Biotechnology Nature Publishing Group. 2016;34:863–8.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 152.

    Moreno-Mateos MA, Fernandez JP, Rouet R, Vejnar CE, Lane MA, Mis E, et al. CRISPR-Cpf1 mediates environment friendly homology-directed restore and temperature-controlled genome modifying. Nat Commun. 2017;8:e20.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 153.

    Kim HK, Music M, Lee J, Menon AV, Jung S, Kang YM, et al. In vivo high-throughput profiling of CRISPR-Cpf1 exercise. Nat Strategies. 2017;14:153–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 154.

    Verwaal R, Buiting-Wiessenhaan N, Dalhuijsen S, Roubos JA. CRISPR/Cpf1 allows quick and easy genome modifying of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 2017.

  • 155.

    Dai Y, Somoza RA, Wang L, Welter JF, Li Y, Caplan AI, et al. Exploring the Trans-Cleavage Exercise of CRISPR-Cas12a (cpf1) for the event of a common electrochemical biosensor. Angewandte Chemie Int Ed. 2019;58:17399–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201910772.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 156.

    Zhang M, Ye J, He J, Zhang F, Ping J, Qian C, et al. Visible detection for nucleic acid-based strategies as potential on-site detection strategies: A evaluate. Anal Chimica Acta. 2020;8:1–15.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 157.

    Gallego C, Gonçalves MAFV, Wijnholds J. Novel therapeutic approaches for the therapy of retinal degenerative illnesses: give attention to CRISPR/Cas-Primarily based Gene Modifying. Entrance Neurosci. 2020;9:89.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 158.

    Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Kellner MJ, Joung J, Collins JJ, Zhang F. Multiplexed and moveable nucleic acid detection platform with Cas13, Cas12a, and Csm6. 2018. http://science.sciencemag.org/

  • 159.

    Bonini A, Poma N, Vivaldi F, Kirchhain A, Salvo P, Bottai D, et al. Advances in biosensing: The CRISPR/Cas system as a brand new highly effective software for the detection of nucleic acids. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2021;192: 113645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113645.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 160.

    de Puig H, Bosch I, Collins JJ, Gehrke L. Level-of-care units to detect zika and different rising viruses. Ann Rev Biomed Eng. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-060418-.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 161.

    Balan V, Wang J. The CRISPR System and Most cancers Immunotherapy Biomarkers. Strategies Mol Biol 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9773-2_14

  • 162.

    Chertow DS. SCIENCE sciencemag.org. 2018; http://stm.sciencemag.org/content material/scitransmed/8/360/360ra134.full

  • 163.

    Redman M, King A, Watson C, King D. What’s CRISPR/Cas9? Arch Dis Childhood. 2016;101:213–5.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 164.

    Yu W, Wu Z. Ocular supply of CRISPR/Cas genome modifying elements for therapy of eye illnesses. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020;89:9.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 165.

    Xiang X, Qian Ok, Zhang Z, Lin F, Xie Y, Liu Y, et al. CRISPR-cas methods based mostly molecular diagnostic software for infectious illnesses and rising 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pneumonia. J Drug Concentrating on. 2020;3:727–31.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 166.

    Ji T, Liu Z, Wang GQ, Guo X, Akbar S, Lai C, et al. Detection of COVID-19: A evaluate of the present literature and future views. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;166:e230.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 167.

    Kostyusheva A, Brezgin S, Babin Y, Vasil’eva I, Kostyushev D, Chulanov V. CRISPR-Cas Programs for Diagnosing Infectious Illnesses. 2020. www.preprints.org

  • 168.

    Li J, Yang S, Zuo C, Dai L, Guo Y, Xie G. Making use of CRISPR-Cas12a as a sign amplifier to assemble biosensors for non-DNA targets in ultralow concentrations. ACS Sensors. 2020;5:970–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b02305.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 169.

    Zhu C, Liu C, Qiu X, Xie S, Li W, Zhu L, et al. Novel nucleic acid detection methods based mostly on CRISPR-Cas methods: From building to utility. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020;117:2279–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27334.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 170.

    van Dongen JE, Berendsen JTW, Steenbergen RDM, Wolthuis RMF, Eijkel JCT, Segerink LI. Level-of-care CRISPR/Cas nucleic acid detection: Latest advances, challenges and alternatives. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;166:112445.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 171.

    Wang M, Zhang R, Li J. CRISPR/cas methods redefine nucleic acid detection: Ideas and strategies. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020. p. 112430.

  • 172.

    Wang X, Shang X, Huang X. Subsequent-generation pathogen analysis with CRISPR/ Cas-based detection strategies Subsequent-generation pathogen analysis with CRISPR/Cas-based detection strategies. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1793689.

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 173.

    Batista AC, Pacheco LGC. Detecting pathogens with Zinc-Finger, TALE and CRISPR- based mostly programmable nucleic acid binding proteins. J Microbiol Strategies. 2018;9:98–104.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 174.

    Chaijarasphong T, Thammachai T, Itsathitphaisarn O, Sritunyalucksana Ok, Suebsing R. Potential utility of CRISPR-Cas12a fluorescence assay coupled with speedy nucleic acid amplification for detection of white spot syndrome virus in shrimp. Aquaculture. 2019;512:734340.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 175.

    Chen Y, Shi Y, Chen Y, Yang Z, Wu H, Zhou Z, et al. Contamination-free visible detection of SARS-CoV-2 with CRISPR/Cas12a: A promising methodology within the point-of-care detection. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2020.112642.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 176.

    Xu H, Zhang X, Cai Z, Dong X, Chen G, Li Z, et al. An Isothermal Technique for Delicate Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Advanced Utilizing Clustered Recurrently Interspaced Brief Palindromic Repeats/Cas12a Cis and Trans Cleavage. J Mol Diagn. 2020;22:1020–9.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 177.

    Wang Q, Alariqi M, Wang F, Li B, Ding X, Rui H, et al. The appliance of a heat-inducible CRISPR/Cas12b (C2c1) genome modifying system in tetraploid cotton ( G hirsutum ) crops. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:2436–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13417.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 178.

    Merker L, Schindele P, Huang T, Wolter F, Puchta H. Enhancing in planta gene focusing on efficiencies in Arabidopsis utilizing temperature-tolerant CRISPR/ Lb Cas12a. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:2382–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.13426.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 179.

    Dong Z, Qin Q, Hu Z, Zhang X, Miao J, Huang L, et al. CRISPR/Cas12a Mediated Genome Modifying Enhances Bombyx mori Resistance to BmNPV. Entrance Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:841. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00841/full.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 180.

    Kellner MJ, Koob JG, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, Zhang F. SHERLOCK: nucleic acid detection with CRISPR nucleases. Nature Protocols Nature Publishing Group. 2019;14:2986–3012.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 181.

    Lee Y, Choi J, Han HK, Park S, Park SY, Park C, et al. Fabrication of ultrasensitive electrochemical biosensor for dengue fever viral RNA Primarily based on CRISPR/Cpf1 response. Sens Actuat B: Chem. 2021;326:128677.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 182.

    Zhang G, Zhang L, Tong J, Zhao X, Ren J. CRISPR-Cas12a enhanced rolling circle amplification methodology for ultrasensitive miRNA detection. Microchem J. 2020;158:89.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 183.

    Palumbo CM, Gutierrez-Bujari JM, O’Geen H, Segal DJ, Beal PA. Versatile 3′ Functionalization of CRISPR Single Information RNA. ChemBioChem. 2020;21:1633–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201900736.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 184.

    Jiang T, Henderson JM, Coote Ok, Cheng Y, Valley HC, Zhang XO, et al. Chemical modifications of adenine base editor mRNA and information RNA increase its utility scope. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15892-8.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 185.

    Scott T, Soemardy C, Morris KV. Growth of a facile method for producing chemically modified CRISPR/Cas9 RNA. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;19:1176–85.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 186.

    Zhang D, Yan Y, Que H, Yang T, Cheng X, Ding S, et al. CRISPR/Cas12a-Mediated Interfacial Cleaving of Hairpin DNA Reporter for Electrochemical Nucleic Acid Sensing. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b02461.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 187.

    Xu W, Jin T, Dai Y, Liu CC. Surpassing the detection restrict and accuracy of the electrochemical DNA sensor via the applying of CRISPR Cas methods. Biosens Bioelectron. 2020;155:112100.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 188.

    Zhang D, Yan Y, Que H, Yang T, Cheng X, Ding S, et al. CRISPR/Cas12a-Mediated Interfacial Cleaving of Hairpin DNA Reporter for Electrochemical Nucleic Acid Sensing. ACS Sens. 2020;5:557–62. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.9b02461.

    CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 189.

    Ramanaviciene A, German N, Kausaite-Minkstimiene A, Voronovic J, Kirlyte J, Ramanavicius A. Comparative examine of floor plasmon resonance, electrochemical and electroassisted chemiluminescence strategies based mostly immunosensor for the dedication of antibodies towards human progress hormone. Biosens Bioelectron. 2012;36:48–55.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 190.

    Ramanavicius A, Genys P, Ramanaviciene A. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy based mostly analysis of 1,10-phenanthroline-5,6-dione and glucose oxidase modified graphite electrode. Electrochim Acta. 2014;146:659–65.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 191.

    Valiuniene A, Petroniene J, Morkvenaite-Vilkonciene I, Popkirov G, Ramanaviciene A, Ramanavicius A. Redox-probe-free scanning electrochemical microscopy mixed with quick Fourier remodel electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21:9831–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 192.

    Wang X, Zhong M, Liu Y, Ma P, Dang L, Meng Q, et al. Speedy and delicate detection of COVID-19 utilizing CRISPR/Cas12a-based detection with bare eye readout, CRISPR/Cas12a-NER. Sci Bull. 2020;65:1436–9.

    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 193.

    Ma P, Meng Q, Solar B, Zhao B, Dang L, Zhong M, et al. MeCas12a, a Extremely Delicate and Particular System for COVID-19 Detection. Adv Sci. 2020;7:7536916.


    Google Scholar
     

  • 194.

    Music Q, Solar X, Dai Z, Gao Y, Gong X, Zhou B, et al. Level-of-care testing detection strategies for COVID-19. Lab Chip. 2021;21:1634–60.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 195.

    Jolany Vangah S, Katalani C, Booneh HA, Hajizade A, Sijercic A, Ahmadian G. CRISPR-based analysis of infectious and noninfectious illnesses. Biol Proc On-line. 2020;8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12575-020-00135-3.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 196.

    Islam KU, Iqbal J. An Replace on Molecular Diagnostics for COVID-19. Frontiers in Mobile and An infection Microbiology. 2020. p. 694. www.frontiersin.org

  • 197.

    English MA, Soenksen LR, Gayet R v, de Puig H, Angenent-Mari NM, Mao AS, et al. Programmable CRISPR-responsive sensible supplies. http://science.sciencemag.org/

  • 198.

    Hajian R, Balderston S, Tran T, deBoer T, Etienne J, Sandhu M, et al. Detection of unamplified goal genes by way of CRISPR–Cas9 immobilized on a graphene field-effect transistor. Nat Biomed Eng. 2019;3:427–37.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • 199.

    Dai Y, Wu Y, Liu G, Gooding JJ. CRISPR mediated biosensing towards understanding mobile biology and point-of-care analysis. Angew Chem. 2020;132:20938–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202005398.

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • [ad_2]

    RELATED ARTICLES

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Most Popular

    Recent Comments